Tools & Wizards About Us
icomparefx.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

icomparefx.com

Review & Compare Online Money Transfer Services | iCompareFX

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

369 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

646 ms

icomparefx.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing ICompareFX content for Canada. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about icomparefx.com

We show you how to transfer money online and review and compare the best international money transfer companies so that you can select the best one.

Visit icomparefx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Icomparefx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

icomparefx.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.12

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

icomparefx.com

369 ms

boise.js

375 ms

abilene.js

390 ms

css2

46 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Icomparefx.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Icomparefx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 785.4 kB (70%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

342.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Icomparefx.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 830.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 664.5 kB

  • Original 830.7 kB
  • After minification 829.9 kB
  • After compression 166.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 664.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 120.8 kB

  • Original 265.9 kB
  • After minification 145.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ICompareFX needs image optimization as it can save up to 120.8 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 106 B

  • Original 31.3 kB
  • After minification 31.3 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (33%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ICompareFX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

icomparefx.com

icomparefx.com

369 ms

boise.js

boise.js

375 ms

abilene.js

abilene.js

390 ms

css2

css2

46 ms

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js

26 ms

f86e7f4.js

f86e7f4.js

295 ms

c995c56.js

c995c56.js

312 ms

20db465.js

20db465.js

295 ms

1a6dd45.js

1a6dd45.js

296 ms

c9645af.js

c9645af.js

394 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

117 ms

international-money-transfer.png

international-money-transfer.png

786 ms

icon-update.svg

icon-update.svg

650 ms

how-to-step1.053d08f.svg

how-to-step1.053d08f.svg

653 ms

how-to-step2.67ed3b4.svg

how-to-step2.67ed3b4.svg

651 ms

how-to-step3.0f63ad5.svg

how-to-step3.0f63ad5.svg

656 ms

transferwise-small.png

transferwise-small.png

657 ms

currencyfair-small.png

currencyfair-small.png

657 ms

worldremit-small.png

worldremit-small.png

705 ms

xoom-small.png

xoom-small.png

702 ms

payoneer-small.png

payoneer-small.png

835 ms

ofx-small.png

ofx-small.png

897 ms

westernunion-small.png

westernunion-small.png

821 ms

azimo-small.png

azimo-small.png

947 ms

revolut-small.png

revolut-small.png

912 ms

monzo-small.png

monzo-small.png

957 ms

n26-small.png

n26-small.png

1011 ms

paypal-small.png

paypal-small.png

1035 ms

monese-small.png

monese-small.png

1122 ms

moneygram-small.png

moneygram-small.png

1089 ms

instarem-small.png

instarem-small.png

1188 ms

skrill-small.png

skrill-small.png

1278 ms

remitly-small.png

remitly-small.png

1186 ms

in.png

in.png

1231 ms

mx.png

mx.png

1301 ms

ph.png

ph.png

1370 ms

ng.png

ng.png

1376 ms

pk.png

pk.png

1424 ms

co.png

co.png

1424 ms

br.png

br.png

1516 ms

css2

css2

26 ms

bd.png

bd.png

1264 ms

cn.png

cn.png

1342 ms

PN_yRfK9oXHga0XV5e8ahQ.ttf

PN_yRfK9oXHga0XV5e8ahQ.ttf

67 ms

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3aPw.ttf

6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3aPw.ttf

80 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vAkA.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vAkA.ttf

92 ms

wEOsEADFm8hSaQTFG18FErVhsC9x-tarWVHLiMM.ttf

wEOsEADFm8hSaQTFG18FErVhsC9x-tarWVHLiMM.ttf

92 ms

icons.faff921.woff

icons.faff921.woff

1328 ms

gb.png

gb.png

1327 ms

rewire-small.png

rewire-small.png

1370 ms

worldfirst-small.png

worldfirst-small.png

1433 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

158 ms

aaeba17.js

aaeba17.js

1035 ms

icfx-logo.svg

icfx-logo.svg

1109 ms

facebook.svg

facebook.svg

1225 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

1171 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

1224 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

1194 ms

appstore.svg

appstore.svg

1272 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

64 ms

google-play.svg

google-play.svg

1221 ms

us.png

us.png

1336 ms

Accessibility Review

icomparefx.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

icomparefx.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

icomparefx.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Icomparefx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Icomparefx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

icomparefx.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ICompareFX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: