2 sec in total
651 ms
1.1 sec
211 ms
Visit idaff.com now to see the best up-to-date Idaff content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about idaff.com
Visit idaff.comWe analyzed Idaff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 651 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
idaff.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value4.8 s
66/100
10%
Value140 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
651 ms
75 ms
68 ms
25 ms
142 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Idaff.com, 15% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (651 ms) belongs to the original domain Idaff.com.
Page size can be reduced by 770.9 kB (50%)
1.5 MB
770.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Idaff.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 602.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Idaff images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 273.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 273.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 465.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Idaff.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 465.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (67%)
27
9
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Idaff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
idaff.com
651 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
75 ms
formidablepro.css
68 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
142 ms
shortcodes.css
95 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
101 ms
jetpack.css
134 ms
jquery.js
191 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
164 ms
photon.js
164 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
3 ms
comment-reply.min.js
164 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
164 ms
waypoints.min.js
169 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
260 ms
custom.js
322 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
259 ms
formidable.min.js
259 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
ajax_loader.gif
179 ms
logoidaff.png
46 ms
css.php
54 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
31 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
31 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
31 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
31 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
31 ms
slider.jpg
197 ms
bg-networking.jpg
147 ms
bg-testimonial.jpg
138 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
73 ms
g.gif
23 ms
nr-892.min.js
16 ms
idaff.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
idaff.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
idaff.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Idaff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Idaff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
idaff.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Idaff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: