2.7 sec in total
464 ms
1.9 sec
297 ms
Click here to check amazing Ideafix content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ideafix.name
Visit ideafix.nameWe analyzed Ideafix.name page load time and found that the first response time was 464 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ideafix.name performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value450 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
464 ms
85 ms
176 ms
184 ms
187 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Ideafix.name, 11% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (765 ms) relates to the external source Top-fwz1.mail.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 284.0 kB (49%)
574.1 kB
290.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Ideafix.name main page is 574.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 393.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ideafix needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 199.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 199.0 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ideafix.name needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (67%)
43
14
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ideafix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ideafix.name
464 ms
style.css
85 ms
farbtastic.css
176 ms
gglcptch.css
184 ms
app.css
187 ms
codecolorer.css
175 ms
jquery.js
260 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
180 ms
jquery.tagcanvas.min.js
259 ms
adsbygoogle.js
7 ms
wp-embed.min.js
300 ms
lib.core.js
300 ms
lib.view.js
301 ms
client.js
302 ms
client.js
387 ms
tag.item.js
340 ms
tag.ui.js
386 ms
handler.image.js
388 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
323 ms
000-300x252.png
374 ms
ga.js
56 ms
watch.js
373 ms
code.js
765 ms
__utm.gif
59 ms
ca-pub-2148158402540780.js
354 ms
zrt_lookup.html
367 ms
show_ads_impl.js
275 ms
collect
360 ms
style.css
222 ms
css
240 ms
style.css
220 ms
watch.js
530 ms
ads
292 ms
osd.js
38 ms
ads
314 ms
5171746271700867932
58 ms
abg.js
69 ms
m_js_controller.js
80 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
223 ms
counter
184 ms
s
143 ms
x_button_blue2.png
142 ms
favicon
155 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
58 ms
advert.gif
85 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
4 ms
1
86 ms
ideafix.name accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
ideafix.name best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ideafix.name SEO score
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ideafix.name can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ideafix.name main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ideafix.name
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ideafix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: