985 ms in total
151 ms
704 ms
130 ms
Click here to check amazing Ideamap content for Chile. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ideamap.net
The analysis and recombination of messaging identifying exactly what to say, how to say it and to whom
Visit ideamap.netWe analyzed Ideamap.net page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 834 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
ideamap.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.0 s
85/100
10%
Value2.0 s
97/100
25%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.0 s
99/100
10%
151 ms
102 ms
116 ms
7 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (105 requests) were addressed to the original Ideamap.net, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (219 ms) belongs to the original domain Ideamap.net.
Page size can be reduced by 47.6 kB (17%)
276.6 kB
229.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Ideamap.net main page is 276.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 247.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.9 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ideamap needs image optimization as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 51% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ideamap.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (25%)
106
79
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ideamap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
ideamap.net
151 ms
style.css
102 ms
adrotator.js
116 ms
urchin.js
7 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
nav_hover.gif
15 ms
us.gif
12 ms
cn.gif
14 ms
site-strike.jpg
52 ms
lock3.gif
65 ms
line_bg.gif
34 ms
topic.jpg
71 ms
3m_small.gif
39 ms
image002.jpg
17 ms
image003.jpg
16 ms
image004.jpg
17 ms
image005.jpg
17 ms
image006.jpg
22 ms
image007.jpg
17 ms
image104.jpg
97 ms
image010.jpg
99 ms
image011.jpg
97 ms
image012.jpg
21 ms
image105.jpg
91 ms
image015.jpg
165 ms
image017.jpg
127 ms
image018.jpg
158 ms
image019.jpg
162 ms
image021.jpg
154 ms
image022.jpg
152 ms
image024.jpg
159 ms
image025.jpg
166 ms
image027.jpg
167 ms
image028.jpg
166 ms
image029.jpg
168 ms
image030.jpg
169 ms
image032.jpg
170 ms
image034.jpg
172 ms
image035.jpg
173 ms
image040.jpg
174 ms
image042.jpg
175 ms
image044.jpg
176 ms
image045.jpg
177 ms
image046.jpg
181 ms
image047.jpg
181 ms
image051.jpg
183 ms
image052.jpg
184 ms
image054.jpg
184 ms
image055.jpg
213 ms
image056.jpg
214 ms
image058.jpg
213 ms
image060.jpg
215 ms
image063.jpg
213 ms
image067.jpg
213 ms
image068.jpg
219 ms
image070.jpg
217 ms
image071.jpg
145 ms
image072.jpg
147 ms
image075.jpg
144 ms
image076.jpg
149 ms
image077.jpg
119 ms
image078.jpg
92 ms
image079.jpg
90 ms
image081.jpg
90 ms
image083.jpg
88 ms
image085.jpg
86 ms
image086.jpg
88 ms
image088.jpg
88 ms
image091.jpg
88 ms
image094.jpg
90 ms
image096.jpg
89 ms
image097.jpg
90 ms
image098.jpg
97 ms
image101.jpg
93 ms
image106.jpg
90 ms
image107.jpg
94 ms
image108.jpg
95 ms
image109.jpg
94 ms
image110.jpg
96 ms
image111.jpg
93 ms
image112.jpg
93 ms
image113.jpg
92 ms
image114.jpg
92 ms
image115.jpg
91 ms
image116.jpg
71 ms
image117.jpg
70 ms
image118.jpg
68 ms
image119.jpg
71 ms
image120.jpg
69 ms
image121.jpg
70 ms
image122.jpg
68 ms
image123.jpg
67 ms
image124.jpg
66 ms
image125.jpg
65 ms
image126.jpg
65 ms
image127.jpg
64 ms
image128.jpg
67 ms
image129.jpg
67 ms
image130.jpg
67 ms
image131.jpg
66 ms
image132.jpg
66 ms
image133.jpg
66 ms
image134.jpg
69 ms
image135.jpg
67 ms
image136.jpg
66 ms
image137.jpg
65 ms
image138.jpg
64 ms
ideamap.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
ideamap.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
ideamap.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ideamap.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ideamap.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ideamap.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ideamap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: