Tools & Wizards About Us
idirect.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

idirect.net

ST Engineering iDirect - Satellite Communications Technology

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

562 ms

idirect.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to idirect.net homepage info - get ready to check IDirect best content for Singapore right away, or after learning these important things about idirect.net

ST Engineering iDirect is the global leader in satellite communications, providing satellite technology and communication solutions.

Visit idirect.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Idirect.net page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

idirect.net performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,300 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.305

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.7 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

idirect.net

171 ms

www.idirect.net

339 ms

gtm.js

54 ms

idirect-public.css

28 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

30 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Idirect.net, 11% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (769 ms) relates to the external source Go.idirect.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 140.7 kB (26%)

Content Size

537.4 kB

After Optimization

396.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Idirect.net main page is 537.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 262.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 133.0 kB

  • Original 162.0 kB
  • After minification 151.9 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 52.1 kB
  • After minification 52.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IDirect images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 262.6 kB
  • After minification 262.2 kB
  • After compression 255.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 298 B

  • Original 60.8 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 60.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Idirect.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (59%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IDirect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

idirect.net

idirect.net

171 ms

www.idirect.net

www.idirect.net

339 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

54 ms

idirect-public.css

idirect-public.css

28 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

cookieblocker.min.css

30 ms

idirect.min.css

idirect.min.css

323 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

31 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

28 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

38 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

39 ms

w.js

w.js

22 ms

DOMPurify.min.js

DOMPurify.min.js

40 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

42 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

72 ms

idirect-public.js

idirect-public.js

71 ms

svgs-inline-min.js

svgs-inline-min.js

70 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

72 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

71 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

74 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

72 ms

landing.css

landing.css

72 ms

ST_Engineering_iDirect_Marketo_Form_Styling.css

ST_Engineering_iDirect_Marketo_Form_Styling.css

385 ms

forms2.min.js

forms2.min.js

61 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

64 ms

all.css

all.css

74 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

60 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

72 ms

idirect.min.js

idirect.min.js

80 ms

form_nonce.js

form_nonce.js

386 ms

complianz.min.js

complianz.min.js

99 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

88 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

94 ms

g.gif

g.gif

30 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

30 ms

munchkin.js

munchkin.js

90 ms

STiDirect-lockup-hor-white.png

STiDirect-lockup-hor-white.png

66 ms

css

css

95 ms

getForm

getForm

769 ms

TussilagoRg-Bold.otf

TussilagoRg-Bold.otf

33 ms

munchkin.js

munchkin.js

20 ms

visitWebPage

visitWebPage

56 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

72 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKx8a8zI.woff

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKx8a8zI.woff

37 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OCtKx8a8zILig.woff

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OCtKx8a8zILig.woff

46 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKx8a8zILig.woff

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OqtKx8a8zILig.woff

85 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OOtKx8a8zILig.woff

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OOtKx8a8zILig.woff

87 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEw8OPIDU.woff

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEw8OPIDU.woff

90 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0yEw8OPIDUg-g.woff

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0yEw8OPIDUg-g.woff

90 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEw8OPIDUg-g.woff

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0aEw8OPIDUg-g.woff

89 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0-Ew8OPIDUg-g.woff

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0-Ew8OPIDUg-g.woff

90 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

91 ms

satcoms-on-the-move-resource-menu-call-out.webp

satcoms-on-the-move-resource-menu-call-out.webp

21 ms

reliable-connectivity-in-africa-resource-menu-call-out.webp

reliable-connectivity-in-africa-resource-menu-call-out.webp

25 ms

milexia-partner-profile-resource-menu-call-out.webp

milexia-partner-profile-resource-menu-call-out.webp

24 ms

skyflow-peru-case-study-resource-menu-call-out.webp

skyflow-peru-case-study-resource-menu-call-out.webp

28 ms

intuition-homepage-3.webp

intuition-homepage-3.webp

27 ms

CABSAT-2024-homepage.webp

CABSAT-2024-homepage.webp

27 ms

Virtualizatio-Path-Homepage.webp

Virtualizatio-Path-Homepage.webp

24 ms

Intuition-press-release-homepage.webp

Intuition-press-release-homepage.webp

67 ms

defence-tech-day-2024-homepage.webp

defence-tech-day-2024-homepage.webp

68 ms

Life-at-iDirect-Background.webp

Life-at-iDirect-Background.webp

68 ms

careers-2022-homepage.webp

careers-2022-homepage.webp

69 ms

How-Products-Shape-Future_1.webp

How-Products-Shape-Future_1.webp

68 ms

Shaping-Future-cropped-1.png

Shaping-Future-cropped-1.png

72 ms

2024-Events-Homepage.webp

2024-Events-Homepage.webp

75 ms

MCX8000-300x250.webp

MCX8000-300x250.webp

72 ms

iQ-Desktop-Plus-300x250.webp

iQ-Desktop-Plus-300x250.webp

72 ms

iQ-200-Rackmount-300x250.png

iQ-200-Rackmount-300x250.png

73 ms

MDM5010-new-300x250.png

MDM5010-new-300x250.png

73 ms

MDM2510-1-300x250.png

MDM2510-1-300x250.png

74 ms

ST-Engineering-footer-logo.png

ST-Engineering-footer-logo.png

75 ms

js

js

45 ms

Accessibility Review

idirect.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

idirect.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

idirect.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Idirect.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Idirect.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

idirect.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IDirect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: