Tools & Wizards About Us
idology.je screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

idology.je

Home

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

236 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

idology.je screenshot

About Website

Welcome to idology.je homepage info - get ready to check Idology best content right away, or after learning these important things about idology.je

Visit idology.je

Key Findings

We analyzed Idology.je page load time and found that the first response time was 236 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

idology.je performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,550 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.277

44/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

idology.je

236 ms

www.idology.je

569 ms

foundation.min.css

68 ms

slick.css

83 ms

slick-theme.min.css

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Idology.je, 38% (21 requests) were made to Cdn.ecommercedns.uk and 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (893 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.ecommercedns.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 446.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

10.3 MB

After Optimization

9.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Idology.je main page is 10.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 10.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 81.2 kB

  • Original 98.8 kB
  • After minification 91.4 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 364.7 kB

  • Original 10.2 MB
  • After minification 9.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Idology images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 170 B

  • Original 13.5 kB
  • After minification 13.5 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 175 B

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 22.7 kB
  • After compression 22.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Idology.je has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (31%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Idology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

idology.je

idology.je

236 ms

www.idology.je

www.idology.je

569 ms

foundation.min.css

foundation.min.css

68 ms

slick.css

slick.css

83 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

86 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

100 ms

froala_style.css

froala_style.css

94 ms

css2

css2

86 ms

theme.css

theme.css

72 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

82 ms

css2

css2

115 ms

jquery.cookie@1.4.1

jquery.cookie@1.4.1

154 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

186 ms

jquery.unveil.min.js

jquery.unveil.min.js

192 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

398 ms

application.js

application.js

70 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

83 ms

logo.png

logo.png

120 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

479 ms

image.png

image.png

893 ms

image.png

image.png

227 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

137 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

233 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

231 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

226 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

279 ms

image.png

image.png

279 ms

image.png

image.png

470 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

281 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

282 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

283 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

284 ms

card_paypal.png

card_paypal.png

441 ms

card_mastercard.png

card_mastercard.png

441 ms

card_visa.png

card_visa.png

442 ms

card_amex.png

card_amex.png

439 ms

card_maestro.png

card_maestro.png

439 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

251 ms

image.png

image.png

430 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

432 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

435 ms

image.png

image.png

437 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexc1RwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexc1RwaA.ttf

86 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNRwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNRwaA.ttf

103 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNRwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexZNRwaA.ttf

172 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRWwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexXRWwaA.ttf

192 ms

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNWwaA.ttf

1Ptyg83HX_SGhgqO0yLcmjzUAuWexRNWwaA.ttf

171 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilntA.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4G1ilntA.ttf

41 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GiClntA.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GiClntA.ttf

37 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5ntA.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GCC5ntA.ttf

37 ms

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5ntA.ttf

pe1mMImSLYBIv1o4X1M8ce2xCx3yop4tQpF_MeTm0lfGWVpNn64CL7U8upHZIbMV51Q42ptCp5F5bxqqtQ1yiU4GVi5ntA.ttf

39 ms

sw-icons.ttf

sw-icons.ttf

35 ms

sw_account.ttf

sw_account.ttf

283 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

68 ms

image.png

image.png

41 ms

Accessibility Review

idology.je accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

idology.je best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

idology.je SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Idology.je can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Idology.je main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

idology.je

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Idology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: