Tools & Wizards About Us
iete.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

iete.in

THE IETE VARANASI

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

54 ms

iete.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to iete.in homepage info - get ready to check IETE best content right away, or after learning these important things about iete.in

The Institution of Engineering and Technical Education is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of engineering spirit and body necessary for a rewarding life of service...

Visit iete.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Iete.in page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

iete.in performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,680 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.121

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

iete.in

86 ms

iete.in

143 ms

iete

55 ms

minified.js

23 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Iete.in, 57% (24 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 683.5 kB (62%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

417.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Iete.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 532.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 407.2 kB

  • Original 532.9 kB
  • After minification 531.4 kB
  • After compression 125.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 407.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 45.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IETE needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.9 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 270.4 kB

  • Original 517.3 kB
  • After minification 517.3 kB
  • After compression 246.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 270.4 kB or 52% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IETE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

iete.in

iete.in

86 ms

iete.in

iete.in

143 ms

iete

iete

55 ms

minified.js

minified.js

23 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

61 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

1125 ms

thunderbolt-commons.1fbb1c52.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.1fbb1c52.bundle.min.js

49 ms

main.80be598a.bundle.min.js

main.80be598a.bundle.min.js

50 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

46 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

49 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

52 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

48 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

48 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

51 ms

d532b29bc0c448b29f47672da7b07613.jpg

d532b29bc0c448b29f47672da7b07613.jpg

81 ms

0d134e_9b4b6437763b4acb9fc89f1a28498379.jpg

0d134e_9b4b6437763b4acb9fc89f1a28498379.jpg

281 ms

0d134e_c22b4c297b4845ada4ecb30e2e871ea4.gif

0d134e_c22b4c297b4845ada4ecb30e2e871ea4.gif

221 ms

0d134e_febb705bfbb04f90acc8060c7754732c.jpg

0d134e_febb705bfbb04f90acc8060c7754732c.jpg

425 ms

0d134e_015cfa5786f446ba8fb75b06e79f569a.jpg

0d134e_015cfa5786f446ba8fb75b06e79f569a.jpg

479 ms

0d134e_e4b631f3535242c8bab3b67981fe925b~mv2.jpeg

0d134e_e4b631f3535242c8bab3b67981fe925b~mv2.jpeg

396 ms

0d134e_1a1e2c6e63f34222aabf5dcb9bfab4b0~mv2.gif

0d134e_1a1e2c6e63f34222aabf5dcb9bfab4b0~mv2.gif

189 ms

41d000_21c47463e1238ab1a26dca04d94e446a.png

41d000_21c47463e1238ab1a26dca04d94e446a.png

196 ms

41d000_1fb5335cb8b1b79c0bd659958f6ea823.png

41d000_1fb5335cb8b1b79c0bd659958f6ea823.png

319 ms

0d134e_ba94f3292b414273afdf56ca366fc20b~mv2.jpg

0d134e_ba94f3292b414273afdf56ca366fc20b~mv2.jpg

278 ms

0d134e_ca0fefe8401f44dd868990c70c19e89e~mv2.png

0d134e_ca0fefe8401f44dd868990c70c19e89e~mv2.png

279 ms

0d134e_00490952f1bf450ea1b5c2a36e590fde~mv2.png

0d134e_00490952f1bf450ea1b5c2a36e590fde~mv2.png

278 ms

a9eddc47-990d-47a3-be4e-c8cdec0090c6.woff

a9eddc47-990d-47a3-be4e-c8cdec0090c6.woff

108 ms

20323430-24f4-4767-9d4d-060d1e89758a.woff

20323430-24f4-4767-9d4d-060d1e89758a.woff

114 ms

94e45703-fbd7-46e5-9fcd-228ae59d6266.woff

94e45703-fbd7-46e5-9fcd-228ae59d6266.woff

108 ms

9ee00678-b6d7-4b4f-8448-70cfa267d36b.woff

9ee00678-b6d7-4b4f-8448-70cfa267d36b.woff

113 ms

ae844b11-5158-4caf-90b4-7ace49ac3440.woff

ae844b11-5158-4caf-90b4-7ace49ac3440.woff

131 ms

d3bbaa1b-d5e3-431f-93a7-9cea63601bb6.woff

d3bbaa1b-d5e3-431f-93a7-9cea63601bb6.woff

137 ms

5c4d5432-75c4-4f6b-a6e7-8af4d54a33d1.woff

5c4d5432-75c4-4f6b-a6e7-8af4d54a33d1.woff

428 ms

cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff

cca525a8-ad89-43ae-aced-bcb49fb271dc.woff

114 ms

60be5c39-863e-40cb-9434-6ebafb62ab2b.woff

60be5c39-863e-40cb-9434-6ebafb62ab2b.woff

114 ms

5b4a262e-3342-44e2-8ad7-719998a68134.woff

5b4a262e-3342-44e2-8ad7-719998a68134.woff

136 ms

5b29e833-1b7a-40ab-82a5-cfd69c8650f4.woff

5b29e833-1b7a-40ab-82a5-cfd69c8650f4.woff

135 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

135 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

19 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

7 ms

Accessibility Review

iete.in accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

iete.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

iete.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iete.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Iete.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

iete.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IETE. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: