3 sec in total
207 ms
2.4 sec
420 ms
Welcome to ifada.net homepage info - get ready to check Ifada best content for Morocco right away, or after learning these important things about ifada.net
Your Complete Guide To Creating A Combined, Responsive WordPress WebSite And The Best Search Engine Optimization For Your Website.
Visit ifada.netWe analyzed Ifada.net page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ifada.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value4.6 s
35/100
25%
Value5.1 s
61/100
10%
Value410 ms
67/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
29/100
10%
207 ms
103 ms
149 ms
60 ms
85 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Ifada.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (649 ms) belongs to the original domain Ifada.net.
Page size can be reduced by 188.2 kB (20%)
927.9 kB
739.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ifada.net main page is 927.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 405.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ifada images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 57.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 27% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifada.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 30% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (19%)
21
17
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifada. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ifada.net
207 ms
js
103 ms
473mb.css
149 ms
473l4.js
60 ms
473l4.js
85 ms
e-202409.js
21 ms
autoptimize_439721be728f70961421247c587379fd.js
230 ms
cropped-Ifada-Logo.png
128 ms
Wordpress-768x475.webp
153 ms
DNS-Propagation.png
158 ms
WP-All-Import.png
164 ms
W3C-Standards.png
145 ms
wordpress-rest-api.png
160 ms
the-503-Service-Unavailable-Error.png
202 ms
High-Quality-Dofollow-Backlinks-1024x615.png
231 ms
Dofollow-Backlinks.jpg
210 ms
On-Page-SEO.jpg
229 ms
Remove-Bad-Backlinks.jpg
215 ms
Ifada-Logo.png
218 ms
DNS-Propagation-150x150.png
274 ms
WP-All-Import-150x150.png
286 ms
W3C-Standards-150x150.png
269 ms
karla-normal-500.woff
277 ms
karla-normal-500.woff
299 ms
karla-normal-400.woff
313 ms
karla-normal-400.woff
362 ms
karla-normal-300.woff
348 ms
karla-normal-300.woff
362 ms
karla-normal-200.woff
383 ms
karla-normal-200.woff
382 ms
karla-normal-600.woff
382 ms
karla-normal-600.woff
443 ms
karla-normal-700.woff
455 ms
karla-normal-700.woff
455 ms
karla-normal-800.woff
475 ms
karla-normal-800.woff
475 ms
kanit-normal-400.woff
388 ms
kanit-normal-400.woff
461 ms
kanit-normal-500.woff
449 ms
kanit-normal-500.woff
461 ms
kanit-normal-300.woff
483 ms
kanit-normal-300.woff
483 ms
kanit-normal-200.woff
483 ms
kanit-normal-200.woff
507 ms
kanit-normal-100.woff
505 ms
kanit-normal-100.woff
497 ms
kanit-normal-600.woff
492 ms
kanit-normal-600.woff
515 ms
kanit-normal-700.woff
512 ms
kanit-normal-700.woff
514 ms
kanit-normal-800.woff
515 ms
kanit-normal-800.woff
529 ms
kanit-normal-900.woff
526 ms
kanit-normal-900.woff
536 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
562 ms
karla-italic-500.woff
534 ms
karla-italic-400.woff
548 ms
karla-italic-300.woff
535 ms
karla-italic-200.woff
522 ms
karla-italic-600.woff
535 ms
karla-italic-700.woff
570 ms
karla-italic-800.woff
520 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
560 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
559 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
569 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
649 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
619 ms
ifada.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ifada.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ifada.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifada.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifada.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ifada.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ifada. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: