Tools & Wizards About Us
ifakt.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

ifakt.com

Plan, Control, and Analyze Business Processes in Real-Time

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

215 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

965 ms

ifakt.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ifakt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ifakt.com

Industry 4.0 software for value stream, simulation, optimization, planning and scheduling. Get your free trial now and explore Polaris!

Visit ifakt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ifakt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ifakt.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ifakt.com

215 ms

en

331 ms

en

425 ms

461 ms

font-awesome.min.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ifakt.com, 84% (78 requests) were made to Ifakt.de and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Ifakt.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.8 MB (76%)

Content Size

15.5 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ifakt.com main page is 15.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 15.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 170.0 kB

  • Original 240.9 kB
  • After minification 209.6 kB
  • After compression 70.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.3 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 11.7 MB

  • Original 15.1 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ifakt needs image optimization as it can save up to 11.7 MB or 77% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 179.6 kB
  • After minification 179.6 kB
  • After compression 169.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 468 B

  • Original 37.1 kB
  • After minification 37.1 kB
  • After compression 36.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifakt.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (32%)

Requests Now

85

After Optimization

58

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifakt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ifakt.com

ifakt.com

215 ms

en

en

331 ms

en

en

425 ms

461 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

40 ms

bootstrap-modified.min.css

bootstrap-modified.min.css

200 ms

bootstrap_ms.min.css

bootstrap_ms.min.css

295 ms

reset.min.css

reset.min.css

297 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

42 ms

gsap.min.js

gsap.min.js

38 ms

ScrollTrigger.min.js

ScrollTrigger.min.js

54 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

58 ms

main.css

main.css

316 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

398 ms

5c726094a17f8ecce0d9462121a802b84dbb3588.css

5c726094a17f8ecce0d9462121a802b84dbb3588.css

315 ms

js

js

86 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

326 ms

uc.js

uc.js

36 ms

fingerprint.min.js

fingerprint.min.js

392 ms

js

js

141 ms

megamenu.min.js

megamenu.min.js

299 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

300 ms

ga4.js

ga4.js

299 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

439 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

549 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

439 ms

revolution-slider.min.js

revolution-slider.min.js

439 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

122 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

121 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

170 ms

Homepage_Slider_polaris_1.png

Homepage_Slider_polaris_1.png

1204 ms

ifakt_logo_quality.png

ifakt_logo_quality.png

207 ms

bullets.png

bullets.png

207 ms

large_left.png

large_left.png

207 ms

large_right.png

large_right.png

216 ms

Homepage_Slider_2_polaris.png

Homepage_Slider_2_polaris.png

1332 ms

Homepage_Slider_Polaris_3.png

Homepage_Slider_Polaris_3.png

1198 ms

LinkedIn.svg

LinkedIn.svg

515 ms

Youtube.svg

Youtube.svg

516 ms

VSM_Icon.png

VSM_Icon.png

517 ms

Simulation_Icon.png

Simulation_Icon.png

617 ms

Designer.png

Designer.png

617 ms

lineBalancing.png

lineBalancing.png

617 ms

feedback.png

feedback.png

718 ms

Consulting.png

Consulting.png

719 ms

IMS_Slider.png

IMS_Slider.png

1834 ms

876 ms

872 ms

VSM_Homepage_Bild_breiter.png

VSM_Homepage_Bild_breiter.png

1578 ms

BSM_breiter.png

BSM_breiter.png

1683 ms

1316 ms

airbus_logo.png

airbus_logo.png

1296 ms

altran_logo.png

altran_logo.png

1395 ms

CSL_logo.png

CSL_logo.png

1415 ms

E_H_logo.png

E_H_logo.png

1431 ms

hueller_logo.png

hueller_logo.png

1494 ms

Jansen_logo.png

Jansen_logo.png

1513 ms

garz-fricke_logo.png

garz-fricke_logo.png

1535 ms

leonardo_group_logo_350x100_S.png

leonardo_group_logo_350x100_S.png

1593 ms

kofler_energies.png

kofler_energies.png

1612 ms

arts-et-metiers_logo.png

arts-et-metiers_logo.png

1634 ms

Trier-uni_logo.png

Trier-uni_logo.png

1678 ms

hochschule-koblenz_logo.png

hochschule-koblenz_logo.png

1692 ms

htw_saar_logo.png

htw_saar_logo.png

1710 ms

IPA.png

IPA.png

1734 ms

FFG_2015_europe_grau.png

FFG_2015_europe_grau.png

1780 ms

Group_39.png

Group_39.png

1783 ms

actmedic.png

actmedic.png

1789 ms

beewatec.png

beewatec.png

1807 ms

Elite.png

Elite.png

1833 ms

collect

collect

3 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

10 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

298 ms

settings.min.css

settings.min.css

104 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

100 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

100 ms

Cardiff_University.png

Cardiff_University.png

1370 ms

JUMO.png

JUMO.png

1372 ms

Eissmann.png

Eissmann.png

1377 ms

FH_Dortmund.png

FH_Dortmund.png

1294 ms

dungs_logo_concrete5.png

dungs_logo_concrete5.png

1320 ms

zf_logo_concrete5.png

zf_logo_concrete5.png

1317 ms

WHB_logo_concrete5.png

WHB_logo_concrete5.png

1267 ms

ctc_logo_concrete5.png

ctc_logo_concrete5.png

1270 ms

Polaris_VSM_blue.png

Polaris_VSM_blue.png

1122 ms

Polaris_IMS_blue.png

Polaris_IMS_blue.png

1135 ms

Pfannenberg_iFAKT_Homepage.png

Pfannenberg_iFAKT_Homepage.png

848 ms

Helbbling_iFAKT_Homepage.png

Helbbling_iFAKT_Homepage.png

840 ms

Liebherr_Logo.png

Liebherr_Logo.png

791 ms

802 ms

822 ms

Youtube-dark.svg

Youtube-dark.svg

712 ms

LinkedIn-dark.svg

LinkedIn-dark.svg

103 ms

Accessibility Review

ifakt.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ifakt.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ifakt.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifakt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifakt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ifakt.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ifakt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: