5.8 sec in total
1.8 sec
3.8 sec
236 ms
Visit ifb.fr now to see the best up-to-date IFB content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ifb.fr
IFB est spécialisé dans l’édition de Cash Office, un logiciel de caisse et de gestion diverses accompagné de prestations de services aux professionnels.
Visit ifb.frWe analyzed Ifb.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ifb.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
5/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value13.3 s
2/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.5
16/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
1786 ms
90 ms
163 ms
168 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Ifb.fr, 12% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Ifb.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 95.8 kB (8%)
1.1 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Ifb.fr main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 682.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IFB images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifb.fr has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (75%)
81
20
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IFB. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ifb.fr
1786 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
90 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
163 ms
style.min.css
168 ms
css
19 ms
reset.css
165 ms
style.css
266 ms
font-awesome.min.css
185 ms
icomoon.css
179 ms
responsive-leyouts.css
244 ms
sticky.css
246 ms
bootstrap.css
334 ms
fhmm.css
286 ms
cubeportfolio.min.css
288 ms
responsive-tabs.css
323 ms
responsive-tabs2.css
327 ms
responsive-tabs3.css
347 ms
flexslider.css
353 ms
skin.css
352 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
409 ms
sky-forms.css
417 ms
animation.css
429 ms
style.css
435 ms
js_composer.min.css
552 ms
custom.css
480 ms
masterslider.main.css
495 ms
custom.css
500 ms
jquery.js
523 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
519 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
605 ms
css
19 ms
css
20 ms
style.css
613 ms
jquery-1.js
672 ms
styleselector.js
613 ms
bootstrap.min.js
670 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
670 ms
totop.js
670 ms
custom.js
670 ms
modernizr.custom.75180.js
682 ms
jquery.cubeportfolio.min.js
611 ms
main.js
611 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
606 ms
custom.js
591 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
589 ms
custom.js
559 ms
responsive-tabs.min.js
558 ms
wow.min.js
533 ms
sticky.js
527 ms
main.js
536 ms
comment-reply.min.js
521 ms
wp-embed.min.js
537 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
529 ms
masterslider.min.js
642 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
554 ms
waypoints.min.js
558 ms
script-min.js
522 ms
jquery.validationEngine-fr.js
536 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
626 ms
front-subscribers.js
572 ms
logo-IFB-essai-reduit2.jpg
388 ms
blank.gif
389 ms
38e4d0ef3ee86a6bda69a7d9412af1c3_logiciel-de-caisse-578-288-c.jpg
412 ms
caisse-professionnelle.jpg
550 ms
5aeaf68dcc7b6a87e63bbc94c41db616_contactez-nous-390-185-c.jpg
562 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
85 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
85 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
87 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
87 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
87 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
87 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
87 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
88 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
89 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
89 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
89 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
88 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
495 ms
title-hline2.png
494 ms
site-img9.png
495 ms
title-hline3.png
496 ms
site-img5.png
496 ms
site-img6.png
495 ms
site-img7.png
517 ms
scroll-top-arrow.png
518 ms
v2.zopim.com
28 ms
icomoon.woff
500 ms
asset_composer.js
36 ms
iframe_api
164 ms
css
112 ms
loading-2.gif
85 ms
none
402 ms
light-skin-1.png
89 ms
slider-bg2.jpg
98 ms
slide-caisse-gestion-ifb.png
294 ms
www-widgetapi.js
6 ms
slider-bg9.jpg
90 ms
slide-experts.png
494 ms
ifb.fr accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ifb.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ifb.fr SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifb.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifb.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ifb.fr
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IFB. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: