2.6 sec in total
269 ms
2.3 sec
62 ms
Click here to check amazing Ifixwp content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ifixwp.com
The best WordPress support online - Unlimited small fixes, 24/7 support, same day turnaround and more
Visit ifixwp.comWe analyzed Ifixwp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 269 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ifixwp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.0 s
88/100
10%
269 ms
42 ms
54 ms
62 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Ifixwp.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (269 ms) belongs to the original domain Ifixwp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 61.4 kB (31%)
196.7 kB
135.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ifixwp.com main page is 196.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 89.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ifixwp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifixwp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 40% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (85%)
34
5
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifixwp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ifixwp.com
269 ms
style.min.css
42 ms
style.css
54 ms
prettyPhoto.css
62 ms
owl.carousel.css
55 ms
owl.theme.css
56 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
67 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
63 ms
responsive.css
78 ms
images.css
74 ms
style.css
76 ms
style.php
248 ms
css
20 ms
woocommerce.css
85 ms
jquery.min.js
109 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
100 ms
custom.css
99 ms
base.css
47 ms
animate.min.css
61 ms
animations.css
66 ms
buttons.css
68 ms
fonts.css
67 ms
isotope.css
78 ms
grid.css
79 ms
layout.css
103 ms
shortcodes.css
87 ms
variables.css
89 ms
jquery.ui.base.css
95 ms
jquery.ui.theme.css
91 ms
mfn-icons.css
53 ms
jquery.ui.core.css
20 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.css
21 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.css
20 ms
header_overlay.png
25 ms
iFixWP_logo_white.png
46 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzjsGyI.ttf
11 ms
4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKfw7z.ttf
16 ms
4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjsGyI.ttf
18 ms
4iCu6KVjbNBYlgoKej70l0w.ttf
49 ms
mfn-icons.woff
56 ms
ifixwp.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ifixwp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ifixwp.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifixwp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifixwp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ifixwp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ifixwp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: