13.6 sec in total
488 ms
12.4 sec
696 ms
Click here to check amazing IFJ content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ifj.co.in
The Indian review of world interiors, architecture, furniture, and design is the leading publication providing a unifying platform.
Visit ifj.co.inWe analyzed Ifj.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 488 ms and then it took 13.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
ifj.co.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.3 s
0/100
10%
Value21.3 s
0/100
25%
Value30.3 s
0/100
10%
Value110 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
488 ms
970 ms
29 ms
234 ms
469 ms
Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Ifj.co.in, 15% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ifj.co.in.
Page size can be reduced by 784.5 kB (17%)
4.7 MB
3.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Ifj.co.in main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 707.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IFJ needs image optimization as it can save up to 707.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 852 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifj.co.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (74%)
92
24
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IFJ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ifj.co.in
488 ms
ifj.co.in
970 ms
css
29 ms
blocks.style.build-67da790a459e0f0cd9807d44ee47a831.css
234 ms
style.min.css
469 ms
style-8843404596642031543b8af98c588f11.css
689 ms
classic-themes.min.css
693 ms
styles-2f64590491155abed9da55ddc0f37839.css
696 ms
settings-c1968fa6e98702cf1d96001da05dd83b.css
702 ms
modules.min.css
717 ms
news.min.css
735 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
916 ms
news-responsive.min.css
920 ms
style.min.css
929 ms
style-a5b5927b3e4fcc668aefde2383540b78.css
934 ms
style.css
952 ms
font-awesome.min-40cc4d0dfcfb2bf3665f202a398e7830.css
969 ms
style.min-2e7a6884db1366f93876c15d9896bb57.css
1145 ms
ionicons.min-5e69139b15df08c69b111f246d31b65c.css
1150 ms
style-5bad7da8a0e87fb9131686057362408a.css
1162 ms
style-a07e221fa069e79407d91b098bd8f510.css
1166 ms
simple-line-icons-5d6a3382e1c5732e77033ea195d5d418.css
1188 ms
dripicons-dca4148aa43a48b496514a843afd45c7.css
1210 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
1373 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
1378 ms
js_composer.min-c1242ef1ea0fbb31f5abcae657b938b8.css
1636 ms
style-438877f0807383d6558245d1f731e621.css
1400 ms
airdatepicker-6960fa9fc4c66f0fd165099cba3b4bd7.css
1424 ms
jquery.min.js
1934 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2302 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2079 ms
custom.js
1632 ms
font-awesome-c05073c6ee3a7167deb4a263eb0eb91f.css
1662 ms
output-bootstrap-5f483766f7a52d02960b6058bf63cfe3.css
1867 ms
hover-min.css
1868 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1895 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2172 ms
index-987c2beb39acedbfbf096bd9d3e7ce34.js
2172 ms
modules.min.js
2171 ms
news.min.js
1950 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1876 ms
js.cookie.min.js
1702 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1697 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1697 ms
script.min.js
1718 ms
core.min.js
1805 ms
tabs.min.js
1805 ms
accordion.min.js
1704 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1937 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1695 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1728 ms
jquery.appear-910feb847508ae6921cb451e3430229d.js
1813 ms
modernizr.min.js
1797 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
1707 ms
jquery.plugin-ede3271c4d84d0c65d0d0b1f38d0b7e3.js
1874 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1863 ms
slick.min.js
1862 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
1842 ms
Chart.min.js
2111 ms
fluidvids.min.js
1715 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
1720 ms
perfect-scrollbar.jquery.min.js
1741 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
1800 ms
parallax.min.js
1593 ms
jquery.waitforimages-e8a67266a832e811fb5dffa2689a4c6c.js
1672 ms
jquery.easing.1.3-cccd2fd36749d21b1a782b0c9b94ae3c.js
1672 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1517 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
1584 ms
select2.full.min.js
1788 ms
lepopup-26474237deab725de66908e90d8c9413.js
1545 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf
72 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf
94 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf
95 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf
97 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf
96 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEA.ttf
96 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZosUhiYA.ttf
96 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9osUhiYA.ttf
98 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvsUhiYA.ttf
98 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvsUhiYA.ttf
98 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUhiYA.ttf
98 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
99 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
135 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
134 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf
135 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
135 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf
134 ms
airdatepicker-1e3e9b70914f0d81fba02e0bfcb83d46.js
1479 ms
home-9-background.jpg
201 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1398 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2218 ms
IFJ_Logo_TopBar_Final.png.jpg
1736 ms
72x106-pixel-ifj-logo-02.png
1613 ms
IFJ-Plus-Banner.png
2611 ms
INDEX-PLUS-banner.png
3347 ms
Untitled-design-2.png
5183 ms
E_E_PHX6614_FS.jpg
3257 ms
8.living-room.jpg
3161 ms
DST_5347.jpg
3160 ms
IFJ_JulyAug_ReadHereNow.gif
8452 ms
Mplus_MayJune_ReadHereNow_NEW.gif
3469 ms
VitrA-V-Care-Prime-1-1000x520.jpg
3456 ms
Photographer-1_RAWVISION-studio_10.jpg
5567 ms
Craft-Not-Carbon-Pavilion-37-%C2%A9-Agnese-Sanvito.jpg
5621 ms
6-T.Rogovski.jpg
4158 ms
IAFP_BannerNew.gif
3553 ms
15_IFJCover01_700x1019px.jpg
3948 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
4269 ms
15_IFJCover02_700x1019px.jpg
4354 ms
16_IFJCover03_700x1019px.jpg
4732 ms
IndexMedia-01-150x150.png
4581 ms
ifj.co.in
4522 ms
admin-ajax.php
4631 ms
ifj.co.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ifj.co.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ifj.co.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifj.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifj.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ifj.co.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IFJ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: