Tools & Wizards About Us
ifolor.fi screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

ifolor.fi

Tilaa ikimuistoiset kuvatuotteet helposti ifolorilta | ifolor

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

497 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

646 ms

ifolor.fi screenshot

About Website

Visit ifolor.fi now to see the best up-to-date Ifolor content for Finland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ifolor.fi

Enemmän iloa lempikuvistasi! Luo persoonalliset kuvatuotteet omista kuvistasi lahjaksi läheiselle tai omaksi iloksi. Tutustu valikoimaan.

Visit ifolor.fi

Key Findings

We analyzed Ifolor.fi page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ifolor.fi performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.123

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ifolor.fi

497 ms

polyfill.min.js

188 ms

common-2024-04-03.css

392 ms

loader.js

21 ms

tiLoader.min.js

390 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Ifolor.fi, 14% (4 requests) were made to App.usercentrics.eu and 10% (3 requests) were made to Api.usercentrics.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (636 ms) relates to the external source Responder.wt-safetag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 205.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

845.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ifolor.fi main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 467.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 199.4 kB

  • Original 222.3 kB
  • After minification 170.9 kB
  • After compression 22.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.4 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 199.4 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 322.1 kB
  • After minification 316.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ifolor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 498 B

  • Original 467.9 kB
  • After minification 467.9 kB
  • After compression 467.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 343 B

  • Original 38.9 kB
  • After minification 38.9 kB
  • After compression 38.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifolor.fi has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (38%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifolor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ifolor.fi

www.ifolor.fi

497 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

188 ms

common-2024-04-03.css

common-2024-04-03.css

392 ms

loader.js

loader.js

21 ms

tiLoader.min.js

tiLoader.min.js

390 ms

clientlib-aem.lc-1712120908376-lc.min.js

clientlib-aem.lc-1712120908376-lc.min.js

579 ms

require.js

require.js

300 ms

homepageTemplate-2024-04-03.css

homepageTemplate-2024-04-03.css

315 ms

bundle_legacy.js

bundle_legacy.js

14 ms

hidden.png

hidden.png

100 ms

image.jpg

image.jpg

287 ms

software_download_720x950.jpg

software_download_720x950.jpg

565 ms

637379853617233

637379853617233

636 ms

3B0CB8_8_0.woff

3B0CB8_8_0.woff

390 ms

languages.json

languages.json

127 ms

token.json

token.json

133 ms

ifolor_Icon-Set.woff

ifolor_Icon-Set.woff

235 ms

ifolor-rebrush-icon-set.woff

ifolor-rebrush-icon-set.woff

99 ms

3B0CB8_F_0.woff

3B0CB8_F_0.woff

377 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

130 ms

stores.init.js

stores.init.js

195 ms

main.js

main.js

384 ms

SessionInfo

SessionInfo

429 ms

fi.json

fi.json

145 ms

cross-domain-bridge.html

cross-domain-bridge.html

6 ms

1px.png

1px.png

9 ms

translations-fi.json

translations-fi.json

37 ms

SessionInfo

SessionInfo

143 ms

intersection-observer.js

intersection-observer.js

106 ms

Accessibility Review

ifolor.fi accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

ifolor.fi best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

ifolor.fi SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FI

  • Language Claimed

    FI

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifolor.fi can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Finnish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifolor.fi main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ifolor.fi

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ifolor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: