Tools & Wizards About Us
ifpl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

ifpl.com

IFPL: Audio, Power & Interface Solutions for Aircraft Cabin Interiors | Home

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

555 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

544 ms

ifpl.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ifpl.com now to see the best up-to-date IFPL content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ifpl.com

IFPL is an award-winning electronics manufacturer specialising in audio, power and interface solutions for aircraft interiors.

Visit ifpl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ifpl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 555 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ifpl.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.4 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,800 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.127

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ifpl.com

555 ms

upq1kpb.css

155 ms

dbc75f170cee9ead0c9ede089e4b8d5e.css

253 ms

a4418c55216bae7736618011f537f77e.css

304 ms

style.min.css

286 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Ifpl.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ifpl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 778.9 kB (29%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ifpl.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 121.7 kB

  • Original 145.1 kB
  • After minification 138.5 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 594.7 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, IFPL needs image optimization as it can save up to 594.7 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 194.1 kB
  • After minification 194.1 kB
  • After compression 166.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 166.9 kB
  • After minification 166.9 kB
  • After compression 132.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifpl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (80%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IFPL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ifpl.com

ifpl.com

555 ms

upq1kpb.css

upq1kpb.css

155 ms

dbc75f170cee9ead0c9ede089e4b8d5e.css

dbc75f170cee9ead0c9ede089e4b8d5e.css

253 ms

a4418c55216bae7736618011f537f77e.css

a4418c55216bae7736618011f537f77e.css

304 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

286 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

381 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

425 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

549 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

422 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

416 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

643 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

506 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

585 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

554 ms

global.css

global.css

552 ms

post-8.css

post-8.css

640 ms

post-16.css

post-16.css

666 ms

post-213.css

post-213.css

670 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

684 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

731 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

746 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

757 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

774 ms

872195a11fb66d000a638ac65302f325.js

872195a11fb66d000a638ac65302f325.js

900 ms

398a16b434e3480c54909f097743c731.js

398a16b434e3480c54909f097743c731.js

819 ms

js

js

72 ms

357a5f826e07819d930c0239ad846c63.css

357a5f826e07819d930c0239ad846c63.css

767 ms

79d637694e0fca3bab2fa5208b6aa5e4.js

79d637694e0fca3bab2fa5208b6aa5e4.js

798 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

805 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

813 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

939 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

1035 ms

01620aade4457a1fe882e19c52a92356.js

01620aade4457a1fe882e19c52a92356.js

925 ms

df428f2b5349530413577facfa4e2a44.js

df428f2b5349530413577facfa4e2a44.js

936 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

963 ms

679b51c18525af35d1dead1f4d43a18a.js

679b51c18525af35d1dead1f4d43a18a.js

963 ms

p.css

p.css

42 ms

iuzjzksqz7

iuzjzksqz7

110 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

95 ms

1337-Main-Page-v1.1.png

1337-Main-Page-v1.1.png

595 ms

AdPower-Product.jpg

AdPower-Product.jpg

445 ms

2082.png

2082.png

747 ms

1052.png

1052.png

567 ms

Dual-Noise-Cancelling-Product.jpg

Dual-Noise-Cancelling-Product.jpg

494 ms

USB-A-2.0-1281-Product.jpg

USB-A-2.0-1281-Product.jpg

663 ms

d

d

28 ms

d

d

66 ms

eicons.woff

eicons.woff

546 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

589 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

630 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

648 ms

banner.js

banner.js

148 ms

19801354.js

19801354.js

74 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

73 ms

IFPL-Site-Logo-White-Shadow-1.png

IFPL-Site-Logo-White-Shadow-1.png

673 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

32 ms

c.gif

c.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

ifpl.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ifpl.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ifpl.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifpl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifpl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ifpl.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IFPL. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: