Tools & Wizards About Us
igc.technology screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

igc.technology

Technology & Program Management Advisory Firm

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

294 ms

igc.technology screenshot

About Website

Welcome to igc.technology homepage info - get ready to check Igc best content right away, or after learning these important things about igc.technology

We bring innovative solutions in technology and program management that help governments impact and improve the lives of citizens

Visit igc.technology

Key Findings

We analyzed Igc.technology page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

igc.technology performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.314

37/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

igc.technology

135 ms

infogainconsulting.com

1012 ms

styles.css

102 ms

style.css

161 ms

css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Igc.technology, 51% (25 requests) were made to Infogainconsulting.com and 41% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Infogainconsulting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 806.1 kB (27%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Igc.technology main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 120.1 kB

  • Original 142.9 kB
  • After minification 140.7 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 684.3 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Igc needs image optimization as it can save up to 684.3 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 227 B

  • Original 142.3 kB
  • After minification 142.3 kB
  • After compression 142.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 22.3 kB
  • After minification 22.3 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igc.technology has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (62%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Igc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

igc.technology

igc.technology

135 ms

infogainconsulting.com

infogainconsulting.com

1012 ms

styles.css

styles.css

102 ms

style.css

style.css

161 ms

css

css

32 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

109 ms

js

js

70 ms

et-core-unified-49579.min.css

et-core-unified-49579.min.css

106 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

158 ms

index.js

index.js

156 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

226 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

160 ms

idle-timer.min.js

idle-timer.min.js

159 ms

custom.js

custom.js

160 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

323 ms

frontend-bundle.min.js

frontend-bundle.min.js

226 ms

common.js

common.js

225 ms

api.js

api.js

41 ms

index.js

index.js

230 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-49693-tb-49712-49579-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-49693-tb-49712-49579-late.css

105 ms

igc_site_logo-momentum.png

igc_site_logo-momentum.png

142 ms

banner-page-iStock-465373240.jpg

banner-page-iStock-465373240.jpg

440 ms

project-management.png

project-management.png

152 ms

artificial-intelligence.png

artificial-intelligence.png

153 ms

Business-Administrative-Services-01.png

Business-Administrative-Services-01.png

151 ms

accounting-office.png

accounting-office.png

492 ms

momentum.png

momentum.png

260 ms

igc_cmmi_transparent.png

igc_cmmi_transparent.png

242 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aXw.woff

30 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw3aX8.ttf

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aXw.woff

43 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf

41 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aXw.woff

43 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw3aX8.ttf

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aXw.woff

42 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw3aX8.ttf

63 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aXw.woff

44 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw3aX8.ttf

60 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aXw.woff

61 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w3aX8.ttf

61 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aXw.woff

60 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w3aX8.ttf

62 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aXw.woff

65 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w3aX8.ttf

64 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aXw.woff

64 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w3aX8.ttf

65 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

192 ms

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9WdhzQ.woff

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9WdhzQ.woff

63 ms

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9Wdhzg.ttf

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9Wdhzg.ttf

64 ms

Accessibility Review

igc.technology accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

igc.technology best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

igc.technology SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igc.technology can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igc.technology main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

igc.technology

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Igc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: