Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

igc.vu

iGaming Content Services - Copywriting | Translations | SEO Outreach

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

227 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

739 ms

igc.vu screenshot

About Website

Welcome to igc.vu homepage info - get ready to check Igc best content right away, or after learning these important things about igc.vu

We are a Content and SEO Agency, covering all aspects of texts you might need for your iGaming product.

Visit igc.vu

Key Findings

We analyzed Igc.vu page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

igc.vu performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

igc.vu

227 ms

igc.vu

162 ms

igc.services

274 ms

ma-customfonts.css

26 ms

style.min.css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Igc.vu, 93% (69 requests) were made to Igc.services and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (316 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.5 kB (38%)

Content Size

334.1 kB

After Optimization

207.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Igc.vu main page is 334.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 145.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 114.0 kB

  • Original 145.6 kB
  • After minification 142.4 kB
  • After compression 31.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 114.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 141.2 kB
  • After minification 132.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Igc images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB
  • After compression 43.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igc.vu has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (66%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Igc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

igc.vu accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

igc.vu best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

igc.vu SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igc.vu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igc.vu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Igc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: