2.9 sec in total
525 ms
2.1 sec
214 ms
Visit igel-faktor.de now to see the best up-to-date Igel Faktor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about igel-faktor.de
Thomas Kilian zeigte in seinem Fachbuch „Der Igel-Faktor“ (2009 erschienen), wie man im „virtuellen Steckrübenfeld“ von Kunden gefunden wird.
Visit igel-faktor.deWe analyzed Igel-faktor.de page load time and found that the first response time was 525 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
igel-faktor.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value1,280 ms
18/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
525 ms
187 ms
287 ms
379 ms
288 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Igel-faktor.de, 2% (1 request) were made to Wp-ux.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (677 ms) relates to the external source Thoxan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 63.9 kB (26%)
247.5 kB
183.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Igel-faktor.de main page is 247.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 165.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 240 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Igel Faktor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 20 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 20 B or 45% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (69%)
39
12
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Igel Faktor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
525 ms
legacy_affl_style.css
187 ms
learndash_quiz_front.min.css
287 ms
dashicons.min.css
379 ms
styles.css
288 ms
jquery.dropdown.min.css
286 ms
learndash_lesson_video.min.css
288 ms
style.css
382 ms
customcss.css
380 ms
learndash.min.css
475 ms
borlabs-cookie-1-de.css
385 ms
jquery.min.js
484 ms
frontend.js
470 ms
borlabs-cookie-config-de.json.js
472 ms
jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js
474 ms
js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js
473 ms
public.js
565 ms
ust.min.js
492 ms
getcurrentusers-min.js
503 ms
borlabs-cookie-prioritize.min.js
502 ms
borlabs-cookie.min.js
503 ms
footerstyle.css
589 ms
underscore.min.js
573 ms
wp-util.min.js
573 ms
scripts-footer-min.js
677 ms
legacy-scripts-min.js
575 ms
wi_lightbox-min.js
575 ms
wyldinsights-scripts-min.js
665 ms
learndash.js
668 ms
thoxan-logo-2.png
179 ms
igel-faktor1.jpg
273 ms
buch_igel_faktor.jpg
200 ms
igel_website-600x400.jpg
362 ms
rezensionen-600x400.png
365 ms
autor_thomas_kilian1-600x400.jpg
274 ms
x-logo-1.svg
279 ms
boxicons.woff
248 ms
getIP.php
508 ms
bct-mailchimp-vanilla-main.png
96 ms
bct-calendly-main.png
97 ms
cb-facebook-main.png
95 ms
igel-faktor.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
igel-faktor.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
igel-faktor.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igel-faktor.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igel-faktor.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igel-faktor.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Igel Faktor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: