Tools & Wizards About Us
igp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

igp.com

Online Gifts Delivery | Send Gifts to India, Gift Items Online - IGP

Page Load Speed

379 ms in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

362 ms

Page Rendered

1 ms

igp.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to igp.com homepage info - get ready to check IGP best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about igp.com

Online Gifts Delivery in 30 Mins across India - Buy/Send gifts to India with FREE Shipping from IGP Online Gift Shop. Unique Gift Items online Same Day delivery in 400+ cities. Order Now!

Visit igp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Igp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 363 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

igp.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,800 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

igp.com

16 ms

igp.com

26 ms

www.igp.com

79 ms

fonts.css

12 ms

jquery-v2.2.4.min.js

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Igp.com, 85% (28 requests) were made to Cdn.igp.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (168 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 579.8 kB (66%)

Content Size

884.8 kB

After Optimization

305.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Igp.com main page is 884.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 480.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 425.4 kB

  • Original 480.5 kB
  • After minification 413.9 kB
  • After compression 55.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 66.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 425.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 147.4 kB
  • After minification 142.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 149.3 kB

  • Original 257.0 kB
  • After minification 257.0 kB
  • After compression 107.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 149.3 kB or 58% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (30%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

igp.com

igp.com

16 ms

igp.com

igp.com

26 ms

www.igp.com

www.igp.com

79 ms

fonts.css

fonts.css

12 ms

jquery-v2.2.4.min.js

jquery-v2.2.4.min.js

28 ms

baseHomeJS-337.js

baseHomeJS-337.js

20 ms

commonJS-566.js

commonJS-566.js

93 ms

rhomeJS-361.js

rhomeJS-361.js

92 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

168 ms

igp-logo-revamp.png

igp-logo-revamp.png

15 ms

search-header-icon.svg

search-header-icon.svg

14 ms

getSelect_redirect.svg

getSelect_redirect.svg

16 ms

reminder-icon.svg

reminder-icon.svg

19 ms

shortlist-new.svg

shortlist-new.svg

18 ms

cart-new.svg

cart-new.svg

22 ms

user-logo-new.svg

user-logo-new.svg

19 ms

rakhi_d_tiles_5_20240703110203.png

rakhi_d_tiles_5_20240703110203.png

20 ms

w-tiles-SDD-v202306.png

w-tiles-SDD-v202306.png

22 ms

w-tiles-flower-v202306.png

w-tiles-flower-v202306.png

23 ms

w-tiles-cakes-v202306.png

w-tiles-cakes-v202306.png

23 ms

w-tiles-personalize-v202306.png

w-tiles-personalize-v202306.png

24 ms

w-tiles-new-arrivals-v202306-v2.png

w-tiles-new-arrivals-v202306-v2.png

26 ms

international_d_tiles_5_20240530184913.png

international_d_tiles_5_20240530184913.png

24 ms

w-tiles-bulk-order-v202306.png

w-tiles-bulk-order-v202306.png

25 ms

rakhi_d_banners_5_20240710151942.jpg

rakhi_d_banners_5_20240710151942.jpg

29 ms

igp-loader-img-new.png

igp-loader-img-new.png

38 ms

30_mins_delivery_d_banners_5_20240627175747.jpg

30_mins_delivery_d_banners_5_20240627175747.jpg

26 ms

birthday_d_banners_5_20240521142730.jpg

birthday_d_banners_5_20240521142730.jpg

27 ms

food_hampers_d_banners_5_1721813500131

food_hampers_d_banners_5_1721813500131

28 ms

anniversary_d_banners_5_20240521142743.jpg

anniversary_d_banners_5_20240521142743.jpg

28 ms

flowers_d_banners_5_20240528101946.jpg

flowers_d_banners_5_20240528101946.jpg

29 ms

cakes_d_banners_5_20240626112012.jpg

cakes_d_banners_5_20240626112012.jpg

29 ms

corporate_gifts_d_banners_5_20240521142835.jpg

corporate_gifts_d_banners_5_20240521142835.jpg

30 ms

Accessibility Review

igp.com accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

igp.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

igp.com SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

igp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of IGP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: