6.1 sec in total
348 ms
5.5 sec
292 ms
Visit igrsa.com now to see the best up-to-date IGR SA content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about igrsa.com
IGR es una empresa ubicada en vizcaya, dedicada a la retirada y eliminación de amianto (asbestos) y fibrocemento (uralita). Gestión de residuos.
Visit igrsa.comWe analyzed Igrsa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 348 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
igrsa.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value13.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value1.265
1/100
15%
Value12.6 s
14/100
10%
348 ms
1337 ms
63 ms
95 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Igrsa.com, 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Igrsa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 84.9 kB (10%)
823.9 kB
739.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Igrsa.com main page is 823.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 500.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGR SA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igrsa.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (73%)
77
21
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGR SA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igrsa.com
348 ms
1337 ms
gtm.js
63 ms
nextgen_gallery_related_images.css
95 ms
cli-style.css
261 ms
settings.css
345 ms
css
33 ms
captions.php
818 ms
chosen.css
352 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
346 ms
woocommerce.css
347 ms
style.css
345 ms
responsive.css
426 ms
css
44 ms
jquery.jqzoom.css
428 ms
pw-login-widget.css
427 ms
ajax.js
429 ms
jquery.js
515 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
506 ms
persist.js
507 ms
store.js
508 ms
ngg_store.js
510 ms
cookielawinfo.js
589 ms
lightbox_context.js
590 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
676 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
684 ms
libs.js
615 ms
common.js
672 ms
jquery.smoothscroll.js
673 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
698 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
755 ms
utils.min.js
755 ms
common.min.js
758 ms
anims.js
766 ms
jquery.jqzoom-core.js
782 ms
pw-login-widget.js
836 ms
ajax-authentication.js
837 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
838 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
847 ms
chosen-frontend.min.js
862 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
894 ms
js
49 ms
analytics.js
17 ms
woocommerce.min.js
808 ms
collect
110 ms
collect
49 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
665 ms
ga-audiences
29 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
583 ms
skeleton.css
590 ms
stylesheet.css
612 ms
flexslider.css
631 ms
prettyPhoto.css
654 ms
carousel.css
580 ms
main_bgr.png
111 ms
grad.png
111 ms
button_search.png
111 ms
header_mail.png
110 ms
france.jpg
109 ms
header_phone.png
110 ms
en_US.png
192 ms
es_ES.png
193 ms
pt_PT.png
202 ms
igr.jpg
273 ms
resp_menu.png
200 ms
plus_tiny.png
200 ms
dummy.png
274 ms
loading_transparent.gif
274 ms
arrow_footer_list.png
265 ms
icon_footer_phone_dark.png
265 ms
icon_footer_mail_dark.png
263 ms
icon_footer_loc_dark.png
344 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
98 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
105 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
106 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
104 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
106 ms
Novecentowide-DemiBold-webfont.woff
425 ms
tDbK2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4nAfcGw.ttf
84 ms
tDbX2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4lLz5CwOnTQ.ttf
103 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rAA.ttf
87 ms
tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwQ.ttf
88 ms
icomoon.svg
511 ms
icomoon.woff
492 ms
admin-ajax.php
1288 ms
timer.png
261 ms
loader.gif
339 ms
shadow2.png
345 ms
sliderfoto1.jpg
744 ms
revicons.woff
416 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
84 ms
igrsa.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
igrsa.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
igrsa.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igrsa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igrsa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igrsa.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IGR SA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: