Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

igrt.com

Home • Image Guided Radiation Therapy

Page Load Speed

640 ms in total

First Response

156 ms

Resources Loaded

426 ms

Page Rendered

58 ms

igrt.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Igrt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about igrt.com

IGRT uses daily CT scanning to create three-dimensional images that pinpoint the exact size, location and coordinates of the tumor just prior to treatment. This increased precision allows for higher d...

Visit igrt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Igrt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 484 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

igrt.com performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

igrt.com

156 ms

igrt.communitycare.com

259 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Igrt.com, 50% (1 request) were made to Igrt.communitycare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (259 ms) relates to the external source Igrt.communitycare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 336.7 kB (49%)

Content Size

682.1 kB

After Optimization

345.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Igrt.com main page is 682.1 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 390.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 138 B
  • After minification 136 B
  • After compression 93 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45 B or 33% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 283.5 kB
  • After minification 263.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Igrt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 313.4 kB

  • Original 390.0 kB
  • After minification 216.4 kB
  • After compression 76.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 313.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 8.5 kB
  • After minification 8.4 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igrt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

igrt.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

igrt.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

igrt.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igrt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Igrt.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Igrt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: