Tools & Wizards About Us
ihhc.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 1

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    19% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

ihhc.in

Best Home Health Care services | patient care taker in Chennai & Bangalore

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

290 ms

ihhc.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ihhc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ihhc.in

We at India Home Health Care understand your needs & provide the best Home Nursing & Care taker services at the comfort of your home. Our high quality and timely home healthcare services such as regis...

Visit ihhc.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Ihhc.in page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ihhc.in performance score

1

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,880 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.847

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ihhc.in

13 ms

indiahomehealthcare.com

404 ms

www.indiahomehealthcare.com

1126 ms

bootstrap.min.css

44 ms

slick.min.css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ihhc.in, 76% (69 requests) were made to Indiahomehealthcare.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Indiahomehealthcare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 89.9 kB (5%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ihhc.in main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 78.4 kB

  • Original 94.2 kB
  • After minification 84.0 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ihhc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 221.0 kB
  • After minification 221.0 kB
  • After compression 218.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 24.8 kB
  • After minification 24.7 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ihhc.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (43%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ihhc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ihhc.in

ihhc.in

13 ms

indiahomehealthcare.com

indiahomehealthcare.com

404 ms

www.indiahomehealthcare.com

www.indiahomehealthcare.com

1126 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

44 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

43 ms

slick-theme.min.css

slick-theme.min.css

52 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

382 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

71 ms

owl.theme.min.css

owl.theme.min.css

63 ms

animate.css

animate.css

573 ms

style.css

style.css

771 ms

styles.css

styles.css

576 ms

es-widget.css

es-widget.css

572 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

884 ms

6eb86a46dba7b7014c3ca5b60295946fe81eecea.css

6eb86a46dba7b7014c3ca5b60295946fe81eecea.css

760 ms

wp-paginate.css

wp-paginate.css

761 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

965 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

764 ms

cookie-consent.js

cookie-consent.js

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

27 ms

payment-button.js

payment-button.js

942 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

766 ms

es-widget.js

es-widget.js

765 ms

es-widget-page.js

es-widget-page.js

768 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

887 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

954 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1150 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

958 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

970 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1145 ms

readmore.min.js

readmore.min.js

1147 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1166 ms

1.js

1.js

15 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

652 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

68 ms

widget

widget

251 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

101 ms

logo.png

logo.png

521 ms

home-banner1f.jpg

home-banner1f.jpg

1276 ms

Geriatric-Care-Geriatric-Physician-Consultation1-2-1.jpg

Geriatric-Care-Geriatric-Physician-Consultation1-2-1.jpg

904 ms

Palliative-Care-Pain-Management-1.jpg

Palliative-Care-Pain-Management-1.jpg

917 ms

Clinical-Care-at-Home-Second-Opinion-1.jpg

Clinical-Care-at-Home-Second-Opinion-1.jpg

1400 ms

HeroBanner_3_V2.jpg

HeroBanner_3_V2.jpg

1403 ms

largest_homecare_mobile-1024x540.jpg

largest_homecare_mobile-1024x540.jpg

901 ms

Geriatric-Care-Geriatric-Physician-Consultation_mob-1024x540.jpg

Geriatric-Care-Geriatric-Physician-Consultation_mob-1024x540.jpg

1278 ms

Palliative-Care-Pain-Management-mob-1024x540.jpg

Palliative-Care-Pain-Management-mob-1024x540.jpg

1093 ms

Clinical-Care-at-Home-Second-Opinion_mobile-ver-1024x540.jpg

Clinical-Care-at-Home-Second-Opinion_mobile-ver-1024x540.jpg

1296 ms

HeroBanner_2_Mobile-1024x540.jpg

HeroBanner_2_Mobile-1024x540.jpg

1283 ms

Orthopaedic_Icon_new.png

Orthopaedic_Icon_new.png

1465 ms

stroke-rehab.png

stroke-rehab.png

1468 ms

elder-care.png

elder-care.png

1473 ms

Palliative-Care-2.png

Palliative-Care-2.png

1486 ms

Cancer-Care-1.png

Cancer-Care-1.png

1589 ms

Tracheostomy-and-Ventilator-Care-1.png

Tracheostomy-and-Ventilator-Care-1.png

1592 ms

Critical-care.png

Critical-care.png

1653 ms

Post-Surgical-Care-1.png

Post-Surgical-Care-1.png

1657 ms

oxygen-cylinder.jpg

oxygen-cylinder.jpg

1663 ms

oxygen-concentrator.jpg

oxygen-concentrator.jpg

1676 ms

bi-pap.jpg

bi-pap.jpg

1777 ms

wheel-chair.jpg

wheel-chair.jpg

1781 ms

cardiac-monitor.jpg

cardiac-monitor.jpg

1842 ms

bed.jpg

bed.jpg

1846 ms

nimbus.jpg

nimbus.jpg

1850 ms

pulse-oxymeter.jpg

pulse-oxymeter.jpg

1859 ms

roboto-medium-webfont.woff

roboto-medium-webfont.woff

1896 ms

roboto-bold-webfont.woff

roboto-bold-webfont.woff

1840 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

1888 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1882 ms

website

website

237 ms

roboto-lightitalic-webfont.woff

roboto-lightitalic-webfont.woff

1721 ms

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

1724 ms

suction-apparatus.jpg

suction-apparatus.jpg

1806 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

33 ms

client.json

client.json

277 ms

client.json

client.json

292 ms

syringe-pump.jpg

syringe-pump.jpg

1752 ms

ventillators.jpg

ventillators.jpg

1765 ms

floatbutton1_5Exiot6Sf7v3AnSCYZCRZjPr5YSBSZklIEwXMYBHeiQ__HoYNWnSox54GymPQ7Gt_.css

floatbutton1_5Exiot6Sf7v3AnSCYZCRZjPr5YSBSZklIEwXMYBHeiQ__HoYNWnSox54GymPQ7Gt_.css

102 ms

floatbutton1_ztXb_dbMzw7lHZO3Zzc0CPCnhRK-Q3Sl92sRNwkBeWelYzrc6CRxFASQ9fRTM3FY_.js

floatbutton1_ztXb_dbMzw7lHZO3Zzc0CPCnhRK-Q3Sl92sRNwkBeWelYzrc6CRxFASQ9fRTM3FY_.js

92 ms

dvt.jpg

dvt.jpg

1707 ms

siq_mpWsf52LIPg9mU40fjRdjF6WMUs-Q0VNu4KH07GkhNZGQTRxW2eRyFJLAq9VKCYB_.ttf

siq_mpWsf52LIPg9mU40fjRdjF6WMUs-Q0VNu4KH07GkhNZGQTRxW2eRyFJLAq9VKCYB_.ttf

21 ms

visit

visit

261 ms

winner.png

winner.png

1330 ms

IHHCPost-11.jpg

IHHCPost-11.jpg

1344 ms

IHHC-Blog-Post-01.jpg

IHHC-Blog-Post-01.jpg

1432 ms

visit

visit

64 ms

logownw.png

logownw.png

1259 ms

SGLogo.svg

SGLogo.svg

1134 ms

call-icon-lg.png

call-icon-lg.png

1138 ms

social-icons-sprite.png

social-icons-sprite.png

1136 ms

socialicons.png

socialicons.png

1278 ms

Accessibility Review

ihhc.in accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

ihhc.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ihhc.in SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ihhc.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ihhc.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ihhc.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ihhc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: