9.2 sec in total
2 sec
6.6 sec
650 ms
Welcome to ihudaif.com homepage info - get ready to check Ihudaif best content right away, or after learning these important things about ihudaif.com
https://ihudaif.com/
Visit ihudaif.comWe analyzed Ihudaif.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ihudaif.com performance score
1974 ms
18 ms
107 ms
72 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ihudaif.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (6 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ihudaif.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (70%)
2.0 MB
606.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Ihudaif.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 277.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 277.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ihudaif images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 870.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 870.3 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 268.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ihudaif.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 268.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (68%)
77
25
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ihudaif. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ihudaif.com
1974 ms
shareaholic.js
18 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
107 ms
tubepress.css
72 ms
styles.css
74 ms
email-css.css
69 ms
polls-css.css
72 ms
postratings-css.css
110 ms
pagenavi-css.css
100 ms
css
67 ms
style.css
167 ms
jetpack.css
219 ms
addtoany.min.css
126 ms
codebox.css
171 ms
commentnavi-css.css
145 ms
jquery.js
284 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
150 ms
tubepress.js
196 ms
swfobject.js
29 ms
codebox.js
215 ms
loader.js
168 ms
highslide.css
1597 ms
highslide.js
1590 ms
wp-page-numbers.css
226 ms
7904a72c842d7c1ebb28b2ddafebe0f3.json
64 ms
all.js
7 ms
jquery.form.min.js
189 ms
scripts.js
198 ms
email-js.js
211 ms
polls-js.js
248 ms
postratings-js.js
222 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
248 ms
navigation.js
259 ms
e-201611.js
8 ms
GVOBadge150x50.png
235 ms
keene-atheism-definition-300x199.jpg
119 ms
domains2.png
234 ms
14-feb-protest-212x300.jpg
196 ms
unemployment_sign3-225x300.jpg
195 ms
torture.jpg
243 ms
bb.jpg
242 ms
3-300x225.jpg
592 ms
favicon.png
191 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
34 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
84 ms
shrMain.min.js
32 ms
page.js
59 ms
175 ms
xd_arbiter.php
65 ms
xd_arbiter.php
180 ms
like.php
477 ms
jquery.min.js
115 ms
like.php
360 ms
like.php
441 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBtIh4imgI8P11RFo6YPCPC0.woff
416 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxoUt79146ZFaIJxILcpzmhI.woff
427 ms
analytics.js
387 ms
pageview.gif
98 ms
vpd1GgSCNsd.css
317 ms
M0DWM6a_9ro.css
431 ms
AdP_CKHZFBh.css
456 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
455 ms
DFmZn3_ZO2h.js
454 ms
mfqI3d6rUg1.js
567 ms
_Qp3v7kqEMi.js
454 ms
like.php
420 ms
rating_over.gif
357 ms
sm13.html
347 ms
icons.15.svg.css
346 ms
app.js
31 ms
vglnk.js
295 ms
partners.js
464 ms
angular.min.js
110 ms
Bw8qRoQ9D-v.js
93 ms
4ylGxU24Rah.js
93 ms
ga.js
165 ms
pixel.gif
124 ms
pixel.gif
123 ms
widgets.js
109 ms
hovercard.css
58 ms
services.css
134 ms
ping
135 ms
ihudaif.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ihudaif.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ihudaif.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ihudaif.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ihudaif. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: