15.5 sec in total
7.6 sec
7.9 sec
59 ms
Click here to check amazing Ilpoeta content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ilpoeta.site
ilpoeta.site is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, ilpoeta.site has it all. We hope you find w...
Visit ilpoeta.siteWe analyzed Ilpoeta.site page load time and found that the first response time was 7.6 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ilpoeta.site performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value5.5 s
55/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.706
7/100
15%
Value5.1 s
75/100
10%
7565 ms
40 ms
77 ms
196 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Ilpoeta.site, 20% (1 request) were made to Sedoparking.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ilpoeta.site.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 kB (36%)
5.5 kB
3.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ilpoeta.site main page is 5.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 3.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 340 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 340 B or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (75%)
4
1
The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ilpoeta. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ilpoeta.site
7565 ms
px.js
40 ms
px.js
77 ms
park.js
196 ms
show_afd_ads.js
14 ms
ilpoeta.site accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ilpoeta.site best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ilpoeta.site SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ilpoeta.site can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ilpoeta.site main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ilpoeta.site
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ilpoeta. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: