Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

imaconi.com

Suspended Site

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

346 ms

imaconi.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to imaconi.com homepage info - get ready to check Imaconi best content right away, or after learning these important things about imaconi.com

Visit imaconi.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Imaconi.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imaconi.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.093

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imaconi.com

235 ms

bootstrap.css

465 ms

style.css

238 ms

colors.css

226 ms

royalslider.css

258 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Imaconi.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Imaconi.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (61%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

886.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Imaconi.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 882.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 31.0 kB

  • Original 37.0 kB
  • After minification 24.3 kB
  • After compression 6.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.7 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 308.7 kB

  • Original 820.6 kB
  • After minification 511.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Imaconi needs image optimization as it can save up to 308.7 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 578.7 kB

  • Original 882.0 kB
  • After minification 849.7 kB
  • After compression 303.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 578.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 458.9 kB

  • Original 524.3 kB
  • After minification 432.2 kB
  • After compression 65.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imaconi.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 458.9 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (58%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imaconi. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

imaconi.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

imaconi.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

imaconi.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imaconi.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Imaconi.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imaconi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: