Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

imadiff.com

Spécialiste FileMaker et Web : hébergement, développement, formation I Ima'Diff

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

266 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

255 ms

imadiff.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ima Diff content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about imadiff.com

Hébergement FileMaker et Web, réalisation d'applications sur mesure : FileMaker, MySQL, PHP, XML, Drupal.

Visit imadiff.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Imadiff.com page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imadiff.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imadiff.com

266 ms

www.imadiff.com

983 ms

css

46 ms

css

44 ms

css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Imadiff.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (983 ms) belongs to the original domain Imadiff.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.5 kB (13%)

Content Size

601.1 kB

After Optimization

525.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Imadiff.com main page is 601.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 367.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 51.0 kB

  • Original 61.2 kB
  • After minification 55.6 kB
  • After compression 10.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 367.0 kB
  • After minification 356.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ima Diff images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 129.8 kB
  • After minification 129.8 kB
  • After compression 115.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 76 B

  • Original 43.2 kB
  • After minification 43.2 kB
  • After compression 43.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imadiff.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (31%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ima Diff. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

imadiff.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

imadiff.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

imadiff.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imadiff.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imadiff.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ima Diff. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: