Tools & Wizards About Us
imadocs.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

imadocs.com

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

123 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

imadocs.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to imadocs.com homepage info - get ready to check Imadocs best content right away, or after learning these important things about imadocs.com

Visit imadocs.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Imadocs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imadocs.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.247

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.5 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imadocs.com

123 ms

imadocs.com

925 ms

gtm.js

74 ms

comment-reply.min.js

107 ms

style.min.css

308 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Imadocs.com, 12% (8 requests) were made to Reviews.rater8.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Imadocs.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (38%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

2.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Imadocs.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 105.1 kB

  • Original 127.9 kB
  • After minification 113.6 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 68.9 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imadocs images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 927.1 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB
  • After compression 753.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 927.1 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 294.0 kB

  • Original 351.3 kB
  • After minification 345.2 kB
  • After compression 57.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imadocs.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 294.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (55%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imadocs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imadocs.com

imadocs.com

123 ms

imadocs.com

imadocs.com

925 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

74 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

107 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

308 ms

styles.css

styles.css

163 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

359 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

267 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

168 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

171 ms

custom.css

custom.css

221 ms

style.css

style.css

226 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

378 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

280 ms

bluebird.min.js

bluebird.min.js

82 ms

fetch.umd.js

fetch.umd.js

105 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

241 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

281 ms

index.js

index.js

294 ms

index.js

index.js

299 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

38 ms

gijgo.min.js

gijgo.min.js

116 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

323 ms

fontawesome-all.min.js

fontawesome-all.min.js

588 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

388 ms

parallax.min.js

parallax.min.js

389 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

389 ms

custom.js

custom.js

389 ms

api.js

api.js

45 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

446 ms

index.js

index.js

414 ms

gijgo.min.js

gijgo.min.js

19 ms

CHIMA_ColorLogo.png

CHIMA_ColorLogo.png

164 ms

Woman-running-outside.jpg

Woman-running-outside.jpg

332 ms

box-box-img1.jpg

box-box-img1.jpg

91 ms

office-desk.jpg

office-desk.jpg

123 ms

b8705f72-1932-11ef-934e-7ec1d3f3eecf.jpeg

b8705f72-1932-11ef-934e-7ec1d3f3eecf.jpeg

152 ms

group_2.jpg

group_2.jpg

206 ms

Copare-e1716929930341-350x234.jpg

Copare-e1716929930341-350x234.jpg

181 ms

Jimenez-Silva_2024_cropped-350x234.jpg

Jimenez-Silva_2024_cropped-350x234.jpg

208 ms

Hanna_2024_cropped-350x234.jpg

Hanna_2024_cropped-350x234.jpg

221 ms

Hatzantonis_2024_cropped-350x234.jpg

Hatzantonis_2024_cropped-350x234.jpg

319 ms

Struby-e1716930070272-350x234.jpg

Struby-e1716930070272-350x234.jpg

319 ms

30-307416_profile-icon-png-image-free-download-searchpng-employee-350x234.png

30-307416_profile-icon-png-image-free-download-searchpng-employee-350x234.png

326 ms

Yurchak-e1716930136922-350x234.jpg

Yurchak-e1716930136922-350x234.jpg

332 ms

Babenko_2024-350x234.jpg

Babenko_2024-350x234.jpg

331 ms

Garrison_2024_cropped-350x234.jpg

Garrison_2024_cropped-350x234.jpg

330 ms

blue-bg.jpg

blue-bg.jpg

1211 ms

testimonial-banner.jpg

testimonial-banner.jpg

332 ms

CH-IMA_Color-Logo-1.png

CH-IMA_Color-Logo-1.png

437 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

348 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

352 ms

GothamBook.woff

GothamBook.woff

353 ms

GothamMedium.woff

GothamMedium.woff

366 ms

GothamLight.woff

GothamLight.woff

408 ms

GothamExtraLight.woff

GothamExtraLight.woff

413 ms

GothamThin.woff

GothamThin.woff

413 ms

GothamBold.woff

GothamBold.woff

424 ms

GothamBlack.woff

GothamBlack.woff

459 ms

394d1e64

394d1e64

728 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

76 ms

Testimonials%20Powered%20By%20rater8.png

Testimonials%20Powered%20By%20rater8.png

18 ms

styleWebWidget.css

styleWebWidget.css

40 ms

google_logo_lg.png

google_logo_lg.png

76 ms

double-up.gif

double-up.gif

33 ms

GOTHAMBOOK.woff

GOTHAMBOOK.woff

29 ms

Accessibility Review

imadocs.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

imadocs.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

imadocs.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imadocs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imadocs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imadocs.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imadocs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: