Tools & Wizards About Us
imageaccess.info screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

imageaccess.info

Scanning Solutions - Book scanners, flatbed scanners, sheetfeed scanners :: Image Access 2023

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

385 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

463 ms

imageaccess.info screenshot

About Website

Visit imageaccess.info now to see the best up-to-date Image Access content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imageaccess.info

Image Access offers book, flatbed, sheetfeed, duplex & art scanners for digitizing large format originals for archives, libraries, museums & industry.

Visit imageaccess.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Imageaccess.info page load time and found that the first response time was 385 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imageaccess.info performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.628

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imageaccess.info

385 ms

pageflip.css

490 ms

pageflip-custom.css

504 ms

jquery-ui.css

514 ms

main.css

515 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Imageaccess.info, 91% (58 requests) were made to Imageaccess.de and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Imageaccess.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 678.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Imageaccess.info main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 44.2 kB

  • Original 52.5 kB
  • After minification 45.8 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 551.2 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Image Access needs image optimization as it can save up to 551.2 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 78.7 kB

  • Original 527.1 kB
  • After minification 527.1 kB
  • After compression 448.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 78.7 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 21.6 kB
  • After minification 21.6 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imageaccess.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.5 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (49%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Access. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imageaccess.info

imageaccess.info

385 ms

pageflip.css

pageflip.css

490 ms

pageflip-custom.css

pageflip-custom.css

504 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

514 ms

main.css

main.css

515 ms

nav.css

nav.css

516 ms

content.css

content.css

518 ms

stage.css

stage.css

583 ms

captcha.css

captcha.css

600 ms

js

js

56 ms

html5.js

html5.js

612 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

718 ms

jquery.touch.js

jquery.touch.js

612 ms

jquery.cloud-zoom.js

jquery.cloud-zoom.js

616 ms

pageflip5-min.js

pageflip5-min.js

770 ms

key.js

key.js

696 ms

main.js

main.js

705 ms

interaction.js

interaction.js

707 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

1012 ms

jspdf.js

jspdf.js

898 ms

addimage.js

addimage.js

805 ms

png_support.js

png_support.js

805 ms

png.js

png.js

815 ms

zlib.js

zlib.js

863 ms

Deflater.js

Deflater.js

1001 ms

jspdf.debug.js

jspdf.debug.js

1198 ms

prototype.js

prototype.js

917 ms

browserdetect.js

browserdetect.js

957 ms

apple_core.js

apple_core.js

995 ms

vr.js

vr.js

1032 ms

library.js

library.js

1050 ms

threesixty.js

threesixty.js

1091 ms

matomo.js

matomo.js

505 ms

matomo.php

matomo.php

318 ms

Logo_ImageAccess.png

Logo_ImageAccess.png

97 ms

TILE_4x6_WT12-SPECTRUM_11-2021.png

TILE_4x6_WT12-SPECTRUM_11-2021.png

290 ms

TILE_5x3_Lauf_20240627.png

TILE_5x3_Lauf_20240627.png

484 ms

TILE_3x3_Press_07-17.png

TILE_3x3_Press_07-17.png

98 ms

TILE_3x3_NewsEvents_07-17.png

TILE_3x3_NewsEvents_07-17.png

99 ms

TILE_5x3_Whitepaper_Wideformat_06-2022.png

TILE_5x3_Whitepaper_Wideformat_06-2022.png

99 ms

TILE_3x3_ISO_02-20.png

TILE_3x3_ISO_02-20.png

197 ms

TILE_5x3_BE5-V2S.png

TILE_5x3_BE5-V2S.png

293 ms

TILE_4x3_WideSCAN_09-2022.png

TILE_4x3_WideSCAN_09-2022.png

197 ms

TILE_4x3_BE5-V2-Archive.png

TILE_4x3_BE5-V2-Archive.png

559 ms

TILE_4x3_Facebook_06-2022.png

TILE_4x3_Facebook_06-2022.png

487 ms

TILE_4x6_BE5-V1A-C50_09-2022.png

TILE_4x6_BE5-V1A-C50_09-2022.png

293 ms

TILE_4x6_BE5-V1A_02-2022.png

TILE_4x6_BE5-V1A_02-2022.png

481 ms

TILE_4x3_MFP_09-2022.png

TILE_4x3_MFP_09-2022.png

390 ms

TILE_5x3_Youtube_06-2022.png

TILE_5x3_Youtube_06-2022.png

391 ms

TILE_ICON_Youtube.png

TILE_ICON_Youtube.png

488 ms

TILE_3x3_FAQ_07-17.png

TILE_3x3_FAQ_07-17.png

487 ms

TILE_5x3_Technomart_20240508.png

TILE_5x3_Technomart_20240508.png

674 ms

TILE_ICON_Blog.png

TILE_ICON_Blog.png

580 ms

TILE_3x3_Contact_07-17.png

TILE_3x3_Contact_07-17.png

583 ms

TILE_4x3_Distributors_07-17.png

TILE_4x3_Distributors_07-17.png

584 ms

ICON_Facebook.png

ICON_Facebook.png

585 ms

ICON_LinkedIn.png

ICON_LinkedIn.png

651 ms

ICON_RSS.png

ICON_RSS.png

676 ms

ICON_Twitter.png

ICON_Twitter.png

679 ms

ICON_Youtube.png

ICON_Youtube.png

679 ms

imageaccess.info

imageaccess.info

263 ms

Index_Stage_BOOK_06-2020.png

Index_Stage_BOOK_06-2020.png

94 ms

Index_Stage_BOOK_06-2020.png

Index_Stage_BOOK_06-2020.png

464 ms

Index_Stage_BOOK_06-2020_en.png

Index_Stage_BOOK_06-2020_en.png

468 ms

Accessibility Review

imageaccess.info accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

imageaccess.info best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

imageaccess.info SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imageaccess.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Imageaccess.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imageaccess.info

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Image Access. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: