Tools & Wizards About Us
imagecomponents.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 26

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

imagecomponents.net

Image Components - Document Imaging SDK for .Net

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

396 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

284 ms

imagecomponents.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to imagecomponents.net homepage info - get ready to check Image Components best content right away, or after learning these important things about imagecomponents.net

Image components is comprehensive and affordable suite of document Imaging processing SDKs for .NET, WPF, Blazor and ASP.NET applications development.

Visit imagecomponents.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Imagecomponents.net page load time and found that the first response time was 396 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imagecomponents.net performance score

26

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,290 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imagecomponents.net

396 ms

www.imagecomponents.net

833 ms

preload_min.css

144 ms

vendors_min.css

500 ms

style-blue_min.css

556 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Imagecomponents.net, 11% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Imagecomponents.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 341.8 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

909.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Imagecomponents.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 806.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 45.0 kB
  • After minification 36.9 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 162.4 kB

  • Original 806.9 kB
  • After minification 644.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Image Components needs image optimization as it can save up to 162.4 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 64.4 kB

  • Original 287.7 kB
  • After minification 287.6 kB
  • After compression 223.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.4 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 78.5 kB

  • Original 111.3 kB
  • After minification 46.7 kB
  • After compression 32.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imagecomponents.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.5 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (68%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Components. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imagecomponents.net

imagecomponents.net

396 ms

www.imagecomponents.net

www.imagecomponents.net

833 ms

preload_min.css

preload_min.css

144 ms

vendors_min.css

vendors_min.css

500 ms

style-blue_min.css

style-blue_min.css

556 ms

width-full_min.css

width-full_min.css

475 ms

toastr_min.css

toastr_min.css

478 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar_min.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar_min.css

533 ms

shCore.css

shCore.css

524 ms

shCoreDefault.css

shCoreDefault.css

608 ms

jquery.loading-indicator.css

jquery.loading-indicator.css

618 ms

icwebsite.min.css

icwebsite.min.css

647 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

835 ms

js

js

59 ms

index.min.js

index.min.js

679 ms

vendors_min.js

vendors_min.js

1007 ms

jquery.dataTables_min.js

jquery.dataTables_min.js

917 ms

dataTables.bootstrap_min.js

dataTables.bootstrap_min.js

743 ms

carousels_min.js

carousels_min.js

788 ms

DropdownHover_min.js

DropdownHover_min.js

812 ms

holder_min.js

holder_min.js

918 ms

bootbox_min.js

bootbox_min.js

998 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat_min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat_min.js

1005 ms

shCore.js

shCore.js

1005 ms

shBrushXml.js

shBrushXml.js

1079 ms

shBrushCss.js

shBrushCss.js

1079 ms

shBrushJScript.js

shBrushJScript.js

1082 ms

shBrushCSharp.js

shBrushCSharp.js

1140 ms

shBrushVb.js

shBrushVb.js

1117 ms

app_min.js

app_min.js

1161 ms

home_full_min.js

home_full_min.js

1218 ms

toastr_min.js

toastr_min.js

1219 ms

spin_min.js

spin_min.js

1230 ms

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax_min.js

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax_min.js

1232 ms

jquery.validate_min.js

jquery.validate_min.js

1287 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive_min.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive_min.js

1308 ms

jquery.loading-indicator.min.js

jquery.loading-indicator.min.js

1344 ms

mainApp.min.js

mainApp.min.js

1349 ms

css

css

36 ms

ga.js

ga.js

74 ms

BlazorIcon_White.svg

BlazorIcon_White.svg

549 ms

logo_raw_white.png

logo_raw_white.png

618 ms

NET_logo.png

NET_logo.png

599 ms

WPF_logo.png

WPF_logo.png

612 ms

ASP_logo.png

ASP_logo.png

633 ms

Blazor_logo.png

Blazor_logo.png

640 ms

IC_Win32ImageEditor.png

IC_Win32ImageEditor.png

675 ms

IC_WPFImageEditor.png

IC_WPFImageEditor.png

747 ms

IC_BLImageEditor.png

IC_BLImageEditor.png

763 ms

IC_HTML5ImageEditor.png

IC_HTML5ImageEditor.png

740 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

124 ms

preload.gif

preload.gif

735 ms

logo_big.png

logo_big.png

744 ms

logo.png

logo.png

788 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

89 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

151 ms

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e0.ttf

7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e0.ttf

165 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

798 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

165 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

199 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

199 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

86 ms

back.jpg

back.jpg

1368 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

80 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

53 ms

51 ms

Accessibility Review

imagecomponents.net accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

imagecomponents.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

imagecomponents.net SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagecomponents.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imagecomponents.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imagecomponents.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Image Components. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: