Tools & Wizards About Us
imagekit.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

imagekit.io

Media delivery and management for high-growth teams | ImageKit.io

Page Load Speed

154 ms in total

First Response

8 ms

Resources Loaded

146 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

imagekit.io screenshot

About Website

Visit imagekit.io now to see the best up-to-date Image Kit content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imagekit.io

Deliver, manage, and collaborate media assets at scale with ImageKit's Media Processing APIs and Digital Asset Management Platform.

Visit imagekit.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Imagekit.io page load time and found that the first response time was 8 ms and then it took 146 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imagekit.io performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,720 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.105

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imagekit.io

8 ms

imagekit.io

33 ms

gtm.js

84 ms

css2

81 ms

css2

101 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 18% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Imagekit.io, 44% (15 requests) were made to Ik.imagekit.io and 26% (9 requests) were made to Ik.imgkit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (112 ms) relates to the external source Accounts.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 179.2 kB (59%)

Content Size

303.2 kB

After Optimization

124.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Imagekit.io main page is 303.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 219.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 178.4 kB

  • Original 219.3 kB
  • After minification 219.0 kB
  • After compression 40.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 745 B

  • Original 83.9 kB
  • After minification 83.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Image Kit images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (16%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Kit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imagekit.io

imagekit.io

8 ms

imagekit.io

imagekit.io

33 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

84 ms

css2

css2

81 ms

css2

css2

101 ms

client

client

112 ms

light_T4buIzohVH.svg

light_T4buIzohVH.svg

60 ms

Swiggy_logo.svg

Swiggy_logo.svg

57 ms

webpack-runtime-35b5eca42f66e866da64.js

webpack-runtime-35b5eca42f66e866da64.js

28 ms

framework-3ffab39471383d784d02.js

framework-3ffab39471383d784d02.js

44 ms

d904c7bf-ac53189b8605e0461d7e.js

d904c7bf-ac53189b8605e0461d7e.js

47 ms

app-f63f6113e0aa40153e50.js

app-f63f6113e0aa40153e50.js

47 ms

nykaa-logo_pOBWO_gI3.svg

nykaa-logo_pOBWO_gI3.svg

48 ms

traveloka_tKBPqER5UW.svg

traveloka_tKBPqER5UW.svg

51 ms

jo_8wfps1NVUi.png

jo_8wfps1NVUi.png

53 ms

big-basket-logo_61DxaCJHw.png

big-basket-logo_61DxaCJHw.png

56 ms

nykaa-logo_pOBWO_gI3.svg

nykaa-logo_pOBWO_gI3.svg

52 ms

Weltbild_35UAV1_zCJ.png

Weltbild_35UAV1_zCJ.png

54 ms

91mobiles_rjB017fHG.png

91mobiles_rjB017fHG.png

55 ms

purplle-logo-1_MWQvpjmjy.svg

purplle-logo-1_MWQvpjmjy.svg

54 ms

Leroy_Merlin.svg

Leroy_Merlin.svg

52 ms

Dubreuil%20(1).svg

Dubreuil%20(1).svg

57 ms

Swiggy_logo.svg

Swiggy_logo.svg

57 ms

ic-appstem-logo@2x.png

ic-appstem-logo@2x.png

60 ms

reversed-g2@2x.png

reversed-g2@2x.png

55 ms

Leader1.svg

Leader1.svg

58 ms

MostImplementable.svg

MostImplementable.svg

59 ms

BestUsability.svg

BestUsability.svg

63 ms

ikLogoWhite_30FbZCVusC.svg

ikLogoWhite_30FbZCVusC.svg

65 ms

gdpr_ready_eVyJexl_y.png

gdpr_ready_eVyJexl_y.png

64 ms

iso-27001-badge_-pxQ1X8IL.png

iso-27001-badge_-pxQ1X8IL.png

62 ms

linkedin.svg

linkedin.svg

60 ms

twitter.svg

twitter.svg

65 ms

youtube.svg

youtube.svg

65 ms

Accessibility Review

imagekit.io accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

imagekit.io best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

imagekit.io SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagekit.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imagekit.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imagekit.io

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Image Kit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: