Tools & Wizards About Us
imagerecycle.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

imagerecycle.com

Image and PDF Compression for Website

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

88 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

338 ms

imagerecycle.com screenshot

About Website

Visit imagerecycle.com now to see the best up-to-date Image Recycle content for Turkey and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imagerecycle.com

ImageRecycle can optimize your website speed by making compression on images and PDF while keeping your original media quality

Visit imagerecycle.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Imagerecycle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imagerecycle.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imagerecycle.com

88 ms

www.imagerecycle.com

147 ms

dropeditor.css

164 ms

customstyles.css

240 ms

titlestyles.css

257 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Imagerecycle.com, 87% (58 requests) were made to Cdn4.imagerecycle.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (409 ms) relates to the external source Cdn4.imagerecycle.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

465.5 kB

After Optimization

413.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Imagerecycle.com main page is 465.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 251.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 26.2 kB
  • After minification 26.2 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 251.0 kB
  • After minification 249.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Image Recycle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 103.8 kB
  • After minification 103.6 kB
  • After compression 91.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 84.3 kB
  • After minification 84.3 kB
  • After compression 64.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imagerecycle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (71%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Recycle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imagerecycle.com

imagerecycle.com

88 ms

www.imagerecycle.com

www.imagerecycle.com

147 ms

dropeditor.css

dropeditor.css

164 ms

customstyles.css

customstyles.css

240 ms

titlestyles.css

titlestyles.css

257 ms

report.css

report.css

258 ms

uploader.css

uploader.css

258 ms

content.css

content.css

258 ms

jquery.lazyload.fadein.css

jquery.lazyload.fadein.css

259 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

302 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

287 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

287 ms

home-report.js

home-report.js

287 ms

core.js

core.js

289 ms

circular-progress.min.js

circular-progress.min.js

290 ms

jquery.filedrop.js

jquery.filedrop.js

318 ms

helper.js

helper.js

319 ms

home-uploader.js

home-uploader.js

319 ms

modajaxloader.js

modajaxloader.js

321 ms

jquery.lazyload.min.js

jquery.lazyload.min.js

322 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

332 ms

theme.css

theme.css

409 ms

custom.css

custom.css

361 ms

uikit.js

uikit.js

362 ms

autocomplete.js

autocomplete.js

363 ms

search.js

search.js

363 ms

sticky.js

sticky.js

364 ms

tooltip.js

tooltip.js

379 ms

menuAim.js

menuAim.js

379 ms

social.js

social.js

383 ms

theme.js

theme.js

383 ms

js

js

49 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

collect

collect

18 ms

js

js

137 ms

398884031

398884031

249 ms

imagerecycle-logo.png

imagerecycle-logo.png

131 ms

btn-violet.png

btn-violet.png

132 ms

bg.png

bg.png

131 ms

uploader.png

uploader.png

111 ms

btn-green.png

btn-green.png

129 ms

video-icon.png

video-icon.png

111 ms

violet-bg.jpg

violet-bg.jpg

130 ms

plans.png

plans.png

140 ms

image-backup.gif

image-backup.gif

148 ms

image-compression-compared.gif

image-compression-compared.gif

149 ms

image-compression-best-price.gif

image-compression-best-price.gif

150 ms

fast-image-compression.gif

fast-image-compression.gif

203 ms

image-compression-API.gif

image-compression-API.gif

153 ms

image-compression-CMS.gif

image-compression-CMS.gif

172 ms

green-bg.jpg

green-bg.jpg

178 ms

ebay-white.png

ebay-white.png

179 ms

lexus-white.png

lexus-white.png

181 ms

bradesco-white.png

bradesco-white.png

184 ms

Logitech-white.png

Logitech-white.png

203 ms

microsoft-white.png

microsoft-white.png

211 ms

Sherry.png

Sherry.png

211 ms

yannick-b.png

yannick-b.png

211 ms

yannick-g.png

yannick-g.png

215 ms

maryse.png

maryse.png

233 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

234 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

240 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

241 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

283 ms

gear.png

gear.png

25 ms

api.js

api.js

18 ms

image-compression-home.png

image-compression-home.png

93 ms

Accessibility Review

imagerecycle.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

imagerecycle.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

imagerecycle.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagerecycle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imagerecycle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imagerecycle.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Image Recycle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: