7 sec in total
1.9 sec
4.7 sec
356 ms
Visit imagesgram.com now to see the best up-to-date Imagesgram content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imagesgram.com
Photo Gallery Of Celebrities
Visit imagesgram.comWe analyzed Imagesgram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
imagesgram.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value5.6 s
18/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value550 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.293
41/100
15%
Value5.4 s
71/100
10%
1894 ms
190 ms
194 ms
130 ms
197 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 17% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Imagesgram.com, 16% (15 requests) were made to I2.wp.com and 11% (11 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source I2.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 397.1 kB (39%)
1.0 MB
609.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Imagesgram.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 411.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imagesgram images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 232.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 232.4 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imagesgram.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (41%)
94
55
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imagesgram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imagesgram.com
1894 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
190 ms
style.min.css
194 ms
responsive.css
130 ms
font-awesome.css
197 ms
jetpack.css
251 ms
jquery.js
281 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
197 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
jquery.cycle.js
338 ms
slideshow-shortcode.js
173 ms
photon.js
165 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
59 ms
wpgroho.js
166 ms
freshlife.min.js
297 ms
wp-embed.min.js
239 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
atrk.js
93 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
Selena-Gomez-Bday-Quotes-2-561x560.png
2602 ms
Ciara.jpg
2028 ms
Helena-Bonham-Carter.jpg
28 ms
Lili-Simmons-Images-4.jpg
1911 ms
Melissa-Rauch.jpg
1173 ms
Foxes.jpg
1231 ms
Tamina-Snuka.jpg
1184 ms
Paula-Patton.jpg
1188 ms
Lily-Collins.jpg
2007 ms
Maria-Sharapova.jpg
1185 ms
Maddona.jpg
1517 ms
Carrie-Underwood.jpg
1237 ms
Hope-Solo.jpg
1251 ms
Lyndsey-Fonseca.jpg
1616 ms
Tamina-Snuka.jpg
1261 ms
Kendra-Wilkinson.jpg
2491 ms
Mayim-Bialik.jpg
2166 ms
logo-imagesgram-2.jpg
86 ms
Bella-Thorne.jpg
1408 ms
Amanda-Peet.jpg
23 ms
Aluna-Sagita-Gutawa.jpg
1498 ms
Uma-Thurman.jpg
22 ms
Demi-Moore.jpg
23 ms
Christina-Hendricks.jpg
486 ms
Brittany-Snow.jpg
1459 ms
rita-ora.jpg
56 ms
Carcie-Van-Houten.jpg
61 ms
Hilary-Duff.jpg
60 ms
Melanie-Laurent.jpg
1666 ms
Marilyn-Monroe.jpg
1164 ms
Alexis-Knapp.jpg
1483 ms
Sienna-Miller.jpg
20 ms
Marilyn-Monroe.jpg
20 ms
Victoria-Beckham.jpg
495 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
380 ms
ca-pub-4367820213531175.js
292 ms
zrt_lookup.html
345 ms
show_ads_impl.js
288 ms
collect
29 ms
sdk.js
29 ms
atrk.gif
327 ms
341 ms
xd_arbiter.php
272 ms
xd_arbiter.php
290 ms
hovercard.css
149 ms
services.css
178 ms
ads
268 ms
test.png
145 ms
g.gif
12 ms
osd.js
28 ms
page.php
89 ms
OuamSSjcmsY.css
23 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
26 ms
YvxwM8R7ol8.js
42 ms
ihptErjAmMX.js
41 ms
11709771_1656850964547906_2460514007945708586_n.jpg
49 ms
12376278_842997075813229_8610122222099358522_n.jpg
19 ms
5343_568200586670635_7976813534260793042_n.jpg
28 ms
10441224_331587340325355_460205327392658681_n.jpg
43 ms
11200770_1611043482504637_1302008016575130108_n.jpg
41 ms
1233586_1398082143755100_367046652_n.jpg
42 ms
12791067_1243788698984331_6159415188275899173_n.jpg
41 ms
10670247_707283789356294_1304690365498255639_n.jpg
43 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
17 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
12 ms
10819362636562558283
54 ms
abg.js
58 ms
m_js_controller.js
70 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
55 ms
R9a_DtVRZgv.js
10 ms
cUDgRFxaoIk.js
15 ms
0JBr1QHp8Gi.js
11 ms
kDOzhTr2W91.js
12 ms
s
29 ms
x_button_blue2.png
31 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
6 ms
imagesgram.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
imagesgram.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
imagesgram.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagesgram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imagesgram.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imagesgram.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Imagesgram. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: