4.4 sec in total
618 ms
2.6 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to imagetext.ru homepage info - get ready to check Imagetext best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about imagetext.ru
Коллекция картинок с надписями для признания в любви, поздравления с днем рождения, приветсвия, прощания и другие
Visit imagetext.ruWe analyzed Imagetext.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 618 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
imagetext.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
29/100
10%
Value3.7 s
57/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value1,030 ms
26/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
618 ms
126 ms
13 ms
180 ms
355 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Imagetext.ru, 4% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Media.reformal.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Imagetext.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 582.9 kB (15%)
3.8 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Imagetext.ru main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 548.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Imagetext needs image optimization as it can save up to 548.2 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imagetext.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
49
49
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imagetext. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
imagetext.ru
618 ms
names.css
126 ms
show_ads.js
13 ms
watch.js
180 ms
m1.png
355 ms
m2.png
351 ms
m3.png
244 ms
m4.png
360 ms
m5.png
361 ms
m6_2_1.png
361 ms
images_10539.jpeg
1051 ms
images_10538.jpeg
1280 ms
images_10532.jpeg
1083 ms
images_10508.jpeg
1318 ms
images_10497.jpg
1201 ms
images_10488.jpeg
1080 ms
images_10487.jpeg
1281 ms
images_10485.jpeg
1560 ms
images_10484.jpeg
1324 ms
images_10483.jpeg
1441 ms
images_10482.jpeg
1744 ms
images_10475.jpeg
1516 ms
images_10553.jpg
1438 ms
images_10552.jpg
1447 ms
images_10551.jpeg
1558 ms
images_10550.jpeg
1562 ms
images_10549.jpeg
1568 ms
images_10548.jpg
1630 ms
images_10547.jpeg
1679 ms
images_10546.jpg
1680 ms
images_10545.jpeg
1682 ms
images_10544.jpeg
1690 ms
images_10543.jpeg
1748 ms
images_10542.jpeg
1799 ms
show_ads_impl.js
47 ms
hit
273 ms
ib.jpg
1673 ms
i1.jpg
1676 ms
i2.png
1685 ms
i3.jpg
1732 ms
i4.png
1735 ms
m1_2.png
1791 ms
reformal.js
233 ms
m2_2.png
1684 ms
m3_2.png
1585 ms
m4_2.png
1589 ms
m5_2.png
1627 ms
m6_2_2.png
1628 ms
tab.png
208 ms
st.php
163 ms
56270%7CaHR0cDovL2ltYWdldGV4dC5ydS8=%7C%7C22607
154 ms
gl.png
98 ms
imagetext.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
imagetext.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
imagetext.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagetext.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Imagetext.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
imagetext.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imagetext. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: