Tools & Wizards About Us
imageworker.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

imageworker.de

Werbeagentur Imageworker® in Hamburg | JTL Servicepartner

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

621 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

321 ms

imageworker.de screenshot

About Website

Visit imageworker.de now to see the best up-to-date Imageworker content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imageworker.de

Imageworker® Werbeagentur Hamburg & Offizieller JTL Servicepartner.

Visit imageworker.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Imageworker.de page load time and found that the first response time was 621 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imageworker.de performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,300 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.1 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imageworker.de

621 ms

imageworker.de

584 ms

1176928832.js

218 ms

537226995.js

222 ms

animate.min.css

334 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Imageworker.de, 11% (7 requests) were made to 2023.imageworker.de and 2% (1 request) were made to Js-eu1.hs-scripts.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Imageworker.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25 B (0%)

Content Size

19.2 kB

After Optimization

19.2 kB

  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Imageworker.de main page is 19.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 19.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 33 B

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (33%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

32

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imageworker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imageworker.de

imageworker.de

621 ms

imageworker.de

imageworker.de

584 ms

1176928832.js

1176928832.js

218 ms

537226995.js

537226995.js

222 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

334 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

511 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

371 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

457 ms

autoptimize_single_ff598394c7245d323e86dfd348e79d53.css

autoptimize_single_ff598394c7245d323e86dfd348e79d53.css

987 ms

autoptimize_single_de96f86a935d2a0ffd9d136370956b46.css

autoptimize_single_de96f86a935d2a0ffd9d136370956b46.css

439 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

648 ms

187692777.js

187692777.js

546 ms

26753568.js

26753568.js

485 ms

autoptimize_e824cb784053754fb4456e6a0665a0e4.js

autoptimize_e824cb784053754fb4456e6a0665a0e4.js

1398 ms

1-slide-bg.webp

1-slide-bg.webp

708 ms

IW_LOGO_RED-e1688256468285.png

IW_LOGO_RED-e1688256468285.png

109 ms

Imageworker-Office-Schild.webp

Imageworker-Office-Schild.webp

223 ms

slide-werbeagentur.webp

slide-werbeagentur.webp

546 ms

slide-jtl-servicepartner-full.webp

slide-jtl-servicepartner-full.webp

550 ms

slide-digitalagentur.webp

slide-digitalagentur.webp

555 ms

slide-b2b-agentur.webp

slide-b2b-agentur.webp

320 ms

imageworker-aufgabe_1.webp

imageworker-aufgabe_1.webp

638 ms

imageworker-analyse_1.webp

imageworker-analyse_1.webp

533 ms

imageworker-beratung.webp

imageworker-beratung.webp

761 ms

imageworker-umsetzung.webp

imageworker-umsetzung.webp

746 ms

imageworker-ergebnis.webp

imageworker-ergebnis.webp

690 ms

imageworker-was-wir-tun.webp

imageworker-was-wir-tun.webp

1096 ms

Service-Partner-Hori.webp

Service-Partner-Hori.webp

692 ms

JTL-Wawi-2-705x406.webp

JTL-Wawi-2-705x406.webp

1070 ms

JTL-SHOP-2-705x406.webp

JTL-SHOP-2-705x406.webp

982 ms

JTL-Connector-2-705x406.webp

JTL-Connector-2-705x406.webp

1655 ms

JTL-POS-2-705x406.webp

JTL-POS-2-705x406.webp

958 ms

JTL-eazy-Auction-2-705x406.webp

JTL-eazy-Auction-2-705x406.webp

1595 ms

JTL-WMS-1-705x406.webp

JTL-WMS-1-705x406.webp

1070 ms

Service-Partner-Mini-300x167.webp

Service-Partner-Mini-300x167.webp

1116 ms

Imageworker-Goolge-Bewertung.webp

Imageworker-Goolge-Bewertung.webp

1176 ms

ping.js

ping.js

52 ms

Imageworker-Partner-TrustedShops.webp

Imageworker-Partner-TrustedShops.webp

1251 ms

Imageworker-Partner-CMO.webp

Imageworker-Partner-CMO.webp

1179 ms

Imageworker-Partner-Placetel.webp

Imageworker-Partner-Placetel.webp

1205 ms

Imageworker-Partner-Leadinfo.webp

Imageworker-Partner-Leadinfo.webp

1226 ms

Imageworker-Partner-Jera.webp

Imageworker-Partner-Jera.webp

1316 ms

Imageworker-Partner-HB.webp

Imageworker-Partner-HB.webp

1353 ms

Imageworker-Partner-ecoDMS.webp

Imageworker-Partner-ecoDMS.webp

1333 ms

Imageworker-Partner-All-INKL.webp

Imageworker-Partner-All-INKL.webp

1486 ms

lato-bold.ttf

lato-bold.ttf

635 ms

lato-black.ttf

lato-black.ttf

635 ms

lato-regular.ttf

lato-regular.ttf

770 ms

lato-light.ttf

lato-light.ttf

772 ms

lato-thin.ttf

lato-thin.ttf

788 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

1588 ms

lato-bold.ttf

lato-bold.ttf

891 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

467 ms

fb.js

fb.js

444 ms

banner.js

banner.js

529 ms

26753568.js

26753568.js

604 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

474 ms

lato-bold.ttf

lato-bold.ttf

806 ms

lato-black.ttf

lato-black.ttf

878 ms

1-slide-bg.webp

1-slide-bg.webp

908 ms

lato-regular.ttf

lato-regular.ttf

926 ms

lato-light.ttf

lato-light.ttf

909 ms

lato-thin.ttf

lato-thin.ttf

954 ms

lato-bold.ttf

lato-bold.ttf

764 ms

Accessibility Review

imageworker.de accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

imageworker.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

imageworker.de SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imageworker.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Imageworker.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

imageworker.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imageworker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: