Tools & Wizards About Us
imagia.ro screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

imagia.ro

bye – IMAGIA

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

384 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

54 ms

imagia.ro screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing IMAGIA content for Romania. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about imagia.ro

Visit imagia.ro

Key Findings

We analyzed Imagia.ro page load time and found that the first response time was 384 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imagia.ro performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

imagia.ro

384 ms

1809 ms

style.min.css

131 ms

font-awesome.min.css

253 ms

bootstrap.min.css

483 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Imagia.ro, 15% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Imagia.ro.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26 B (0%)

Content Size

17.2 kB

After Optimization

17.1 kB

  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Imagia.ro main page is 17.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 17.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (86%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IMAGIA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

imagia.ro

imagia.ro

384 ms

1809 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

131 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

253 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

483 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

381 ms

style.css

style.css

612 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

385 ms

gillion-dynamic-styles.css

gillion-dynamic-styles.css

389 ms

plyr.css

plyr.css

387 ms

css

css

43 ms

style.css

style.css

499 ms

analytics-talk-content-tracking.js

analytics-talk-content-tracking.js

516 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

515 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

520 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

731 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

637 ms

plyr.min.js

plyr.min.js

645 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

644 ms

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

648 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

749 ms

player.js

player.js

49 ms

gtm4wp-vimeo.js

gtm4wp-vimeo.js

750 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

771 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

772 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

777 ms

forms.js

forms.js

850 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

81 ms

cursor.png

cursor.png

120 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

19 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

23 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

29 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

44 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

240 ms

ga.js

ga.js

17 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

collect

collect

34 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

74 ms

Accessibility Review

imagia.ro accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

imagia.ro best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

imagia.ro SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RO

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagia.ro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Imagia.ro main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

imagia.ro

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IMAGIA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: