4.2 sec in total
713 ms
3 sec
508 ms
Click here to check amazing Imagine content for Nigeria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about imagine.com.ng
Services
Visit imagine.com.ngWe analyzed Imagine.com.ng page load time and found that the first response time was 713 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
imagine.com.ng performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value16.5 s
0/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.038
100/100
15%
Value8.1 s
41/100
10%
713 ms
236 ms
187 ms
252 ms
399 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Imagine.com.ng, 20% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (914 ms) belongs to the original domain Imagine.com.ng.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (27%)
5.6 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Imagine.com.ng main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 176.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imagine images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 680.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 680.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 568.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imagine.com.ng needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 568.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (47%)
57
30
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imagine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.imagine.com.ng
713 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
236 ms
styles.css
187 ms
settings.css
252 ms
bootstrap.min.css
399 ms
ss-gizmo.css
213 ms
font-awesome.min.css
318 ms
style.css
511 ms
responsive.css
341 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.js
435 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
337 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
583 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
579 ms
css
15 ms
jquery.form.min.js
257 ms
scripts.js
304 ms
bootstrap.min.js
332 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.2.custom.min.js
335 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
417 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
417 ms
theme-scripts.js
612 ms
ilightbox.min.js
437 ms
js
18 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
459 ms
imagesloaded.js
465 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
465 ms
functions.js
587 ms
comment-reply.min.js
582 ms
wp-embed.min.js
494 ms
ifeanyi-and-chisa-photography-by-imagine-photography-46.jpg
279 ms
abstract-backgrounds-10.jpg
895 ms
imagine.png
155 ms
Ebun-and-Ladi-Wedding-Phototography-Imagine_2.jpg
340 ms
Ebun-and-Ladi-Wedding-Phototography-Imagine_5.png
339 ms
Ebun-and-Ladi-Wedding-Phototography-Imagine_6.png
340 ms
12.jpg
911 ms
6.jpg
914 ms
22.jpg
907 ms
Cregital-Footer-Ident.png
272 ms
Bimbo-and-Tunde-Traditional-Wedding-by-Imagine-Photography-18-420x315.jpg
885 ms
Heman-and-Tutu-Imagine-Photography-34-420x315.jpg
890 ms
toyosi-and-laolu-prewedding-photographyby-imagine-photography-8-420x315.jpg
892 ms
Bunmi-and-Mayowa-photography-by-Imagine-photography-58-420x315.jpg
893 ms
Tomori-and-Dare-by-Imagine-Photography-23-420x315.jpg
896 ms
24-420x315.jpg
906 ms
37-420x315.jpg
894 ms
ada-and-obi-photography-by-imagine-16-420x315.jpg
913 ms
c-18-420x315.jpg
908 ms
25-420x315.jpg
908 ms
28-420x315.jpg
910 ms
b-8-420x315.jpg
911 ms
15-420x315.jpg
912 ms
29-420x315.jpg
912 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
89 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
85 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
85 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
85 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
84 ms
v0SdcGFAl2aezM9Vq_aFTQ.ttf
22 ms
nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf
22 ms
zJY4gsxBiSo5L7tNutxFNg.ttf
22 ms
DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf
22 ms
4cKlrioa77J2iqTqBgkRWg.ttf
20 ms
ss-gizmo.woff
782 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
19 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
20 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
19 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
20 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxlDMrAYtoOisqqMDW9M_Mqc.ttf
20 ms
loader.gif
152 ms
bullet.png
153 ms
large_left.png
153 ms
large_right.png
152 ms
imagine.com.ng accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
imagine.com.ng best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
imagine.com.ng SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagine.com.ng can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imagine.com.ng main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imagine.com.ng
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imagine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: