7.9 sec in total
699 ms
7 sec
266 ms
Welcome to imed.com homepage info - get ready to check Imed best content for Venezuela right away, or after learning these important things about imed.com
From small practices to large hospitals, facilities of all sizes trust iMed.com to provide high quality, business support services.
Visit imed.comWe analyzed Imed.com page load time and found that the first response time was 699 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
imed.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value6.9 s
7/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value1,210 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.967
2/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
699 ms
116 ms
18 ms
19 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Imed.com, 85% (76 requests) were made to Ec2-54-208-241-253.compute-1.amazonaws.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Frauditor.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.2 sec) relates to the external source Frauditor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 938.5 kB (57%)
1.7 MB
721.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Imed.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 690.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 196.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 196.9 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imed images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 514.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 514.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 195.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imed.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 195.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (65%)
86
30
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imed. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imed.com
699 ms
styles.css
116 ms
widgets.css
18 ms
brands.css
19 ms
itemgrid.css
19 ms
accordion.css
20 ms
ultra-megamenu.css
26 ms
classic.css
21 ms
ultra-slideshow.css
21 ms
generic-nav.css
22 ms
generic-cck.css
22 ms
itemslider.css
23 ms
dropdown.css
24 ms
skin.css
24 ms
prototype.js
125 ms
ccard.js
25 ms
validation.js
46 ms
builder.js
24 ms
effects.js
44 ms
dragdrop.js
48 ms
controls.js
46 ms
slider.js
53 ms
js.js
65 ms
form.js
49 ms
menu.js
52 ms
translate.js
50 ms
cookies.js
53 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
121 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
59 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
57 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
60 ms
tabs.min.js
62 ms
jquery.accordion.js
63 ms
_grid_imed_en.css
69 ms
_layout_imed_en.css
67 ms
_design_imed_en.css
68 ms
custom.css
68 ms
css
24 ms
beetailer.js
20 ms
foot.js
78 ms
ga.js
147 ms
imed_logo.gif
63 ms
icons.png
63 ms
pix.png
63 ms
link-separator.png
64 ms
arrow-dropdown.png
64 ms
2014-01-04_1826.png
87 ms
patient-care-1.jpg
71 ms
slider_bk_right_burst.gif
71 ms
type-medical.jpg
62 ms
doctor-patient.jpg
62 ms
controlling_costs.jpg
62 ms
world.png
63 ms
star.png
65 ms
responsive.png
64 ms
menu.png
65 ms
221028.jpg
69 ms
167553.jpg
67 ms
161086.jpg
68 ms
161109.jpg
68 ms
161110.jpg
66 ms
161146.jpg
67 ms
161147.jpg
67 ms
191908.jpg
68 ms
221095.jpg
69 ms
221051.jpg
71 ms
161099.jpg
69 ms
221042.jpg
71 ms
221066.jpg
70 ms
194182.jpg
72 ms
221038.jpg
72 ms
info.png
74 ms
email.png
74 ms
phone.png
73 ms
bullet.png
34 ms
2hig-tnMw8lXZsjwuh-9ow.ttf
57 ms
print.css
52 ms
__utm.gif
50 ms
1.png
40 ms
bullet.png
41 ms
slider-arrows.png
22 ms
13.png
65 ms
opener.png
3 ms
pager.png
23 ms
deviceinfo.cfm
5160 ms
promotions.js
30 ms
jquery.js
345 ms
_swfobject.js
188 ms
fp_combined.js
371 ms
imed.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
imed.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
imed.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imed.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imed.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imed.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imed. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: