1.6 sec in total
250 ms
964 ms
338 ms
Welcome to imgite.com homepage info - get ready to check Imgite best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about imgite.com
Edit images, resize, flip, rotate apply effects to your images.
Visit imgite.comWe analyzed Imgite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 250 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
imgite.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value4.2 s
45/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value530 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
250 ms
17 ms
87 ms
170 ms
169 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Imgite.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (447 ms) belongs to the original domain Imgite.com.
Page size can be reduced by 321.5 kB (38%)
849.0 kB
527.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Imgite.com main page is 849.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 399.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imgite images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 196.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 196.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 98.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imgite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 98.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (56%)
62
27
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imgite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imgite.com
250 ms
bootstrap.min.css
17 ms
style.css
87 ms
blueimp-gallery.min.css
170 ms
jquery.fileupload.css
169 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui.css
171 ms
show_ads.js
25 ms
jquery.min.js
23 ms
jquery.ui.widget.js
213 ms
tmpl.min.js
213 ms
load-image.all.min.js
214 ms
canvas-to-blob.min.js
287 ms
bootstrap.min.js
20 ms
jquery.blueimp-gallery.min.js
292 ms
jquery.iframe-transport.js
291 ms
jquery.fileupload.js
296 ms
jquery.fileupload-process.js
294 ms
jquery.fileupload-image.js
296 ms
jquery.fileupload-audio.js
344 ms
jquery.fileupload-video.js
346 ms
jquery.fileupload-validate.js
347 ms
jquery.fileupload-ui.js
349 ms
main.js
347 ms
like.php
53 ms
ca-pub-5518061887009340.js
43 ms
zrt_lookup.html
44 ms
show_ads_impl.js
46 ms
GRAY.jpg
145 ms
BOOST.jpg
220 ms
FUZZY.jpg
220 ms
AQUA.jpg
231 ms
LIGHT.jpg
229 ms
OLD.jpg
226 ms
OLD2.jpg
243 ms
COOL.jpg
447 ms
SEPIA.jpg
357 ms
SHARPEN.jpg
355 ms
OLD3.jpg
356 ms
EMBOSS.jpg
414 ms
COLORISE.jpg
356 ms
BUBBLES.jpg
446 ms
ads
187 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
22 ms
osd.js
9 ms
ads
161 ms
small.js
200 ms
counter.js
8 ms
t.php
190 ms
282 ms
loading.gif
254 ms
m_js_controller.js
33 ms
abg.js
48 ms
9749845229268518826
70 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
78 ms
favicon
101 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
55 ms
s
46 ms
x_button_blue2.png
13 ms
18 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
5 ms
dpx.js
32 ms
tpid=1DE70445AD33D5562203B035024875EF
16 ms
p
29 ms
dpx
3 ms
match_redirect
5 ms
ui
32 ms
29931
39 ms
imgite.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
imgite.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
imgite.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imgite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Imgite.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imgite.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Imgite. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: