Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

immartripoli.com

Immar Tripoli Co.

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

173 ms

immartripoli.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to immartripoli.com homepage info - get ready to check Immar Tripoli best content right away, or after learning these important things about immartripoli.com

Immar Tripoli Co. , Immar Tripoli , fekrix , Fekri Habib blidi , tripoli, libya

Visit immartripoli.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Immartripoli.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

immartripoli.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

immartripoli.com

1005 ms

back.jpg

287 ms

a4.gif

705 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Immartripoli.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Immartripoli.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.4 kB (32%)

Content Size

7.5 kB

After Optimization

5.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Immartripoli.com main page is 7.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 3.7 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 398 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 18 B

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Immar Tripoli images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Immar Tripoli. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

immartripoli.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

immartripoli.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

immartripoli.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Immartripoli.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Immartripoli.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Immar Tripoli. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: