Tools & Wizards About Us
immediateedge.review screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

immediateedge.review

Immediate Edge Review 2023 | Scam Or Legit? Let’s Investigate!

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

112 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

72 ms

immediateedge.review screenshot

About Website

Welcome to immediateedge.review homepage info - get ready to check Immediate Edge best content right away, or after learning these important things about immediateedge.review

A well-tailored sneak peek into the functions, features, benefits, and recommended reasons to choose the Immediate Edge app as a preferred trading platform.

Visit immediateedge.review

Key Findings

We analyzed Immediateedge.review page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

immediateedge.review performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.1 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

immediateedge.review

112 ms

www.immediateedge.review

277 ms

style.min.css

68 ms

classic-themes.min.css

100 ms

news247-main.css

98 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Immediateedge.review, 22% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (277 ms) belongs to the original domain Immediateedge.review.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.1 kB (25%)

Content Size

446.6 kB

After Optimization

336.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Immediateedge.review main page is 446.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 309.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 109.6 kB

  • Original 136.7 kB
  • After minification 133.0 kB
  • After compression 27.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 492 B

  • Original 309.9 kB
  • After minification 309.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Immediate Edge images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Immediate Edge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

immediateedge.review

immediateedge.review

112 ms

www.immediateedge.review

www.immediateedge.review

277 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

68 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

100 ms

news247-main.css

news247-main.css

98 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

133 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

100 ms

icofont.min.css

icofont.min.css

134 ms

wpmm.css

wpmm.css

103 ms

wpmm-featuresbox.css

wpmm-featuresbox.css

131 ms

wpmm-gridpost.css

wpmm-gridpost.css

131 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

142 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

140 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

163 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

199 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

167 ms

bootstrap-wp.css

bootstrap-wp.css

166 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

169 ms

owl.theme.default.css

owl.theme.default.css

170 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

195 ms

style.css

style.css

205 ms

css

css

35 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

177 ms

gutenberg-custom.css

gutenberg-custom.css

178 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

183 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

238 ms

post-92.css

post-92.css

205 ms

global.css

global.css

205 ms

post-56.css

post-56.css

209 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

207 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

209 ms

close.png

close.png

42 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

40 ms

prev.png

prev.png

40 ms

next.png

next.png

41 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcDhrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcDhrE.ttf

50 ms

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcDhrE.ttf

P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcDhrE.ttf

74 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

79 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

80 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

110 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

115 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

115 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

68 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

37 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

36 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

37 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

67 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

70 ms

Immediateedge-review.svg

Immediateedge-review.svg

66 ms

algorithm-to-identify-only-profitable-trades-1024x573.png

algorithm-to-identify-only-profitable-trades-1024x573.png

102 ms

gain-immidiate-access-to-this-revolutionary-software-1024x562.png

gain-immidiate-access-to-this-revolutionary-software-1024x562.png

103 ms

Accessibility Review

immediateedge.review accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

immediateedge.review best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

immediateedge.review SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Immediateedge.review can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Immediateedge.review main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

immediateedge.review

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Immediate Edge. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: