Access impact.no. Impact

Report Summary

About Website

Click here to check amazing Impact content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about impact.no

Rekruttering Andre tjenester Ledige stillinger «Grundighet varer lengst» Vi har erfart at grundighet varer lengst, repetisjon og kompromissløst søkelys på kvalitet gir solide kandidater til beste for ...

Visit impact.no

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

impact.no

1603 ms

frontend.css

113 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

220 ms

grid.min.css

323 ms

helper-parts.min.css

326 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Impact.no, 16% (13 requests) were made to Cdn.recman.no. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.recman.no.

Content Size

7.9 MB

After Optimization

7.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Impact.no main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 109.8 kB

Original 131.5 kB
After minification 126.9 kB
After compression 21.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 66.7 kB

Original 7.5 MB
After minification 7.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Impact images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 536 B

Original 168.0 kB
After minification 168.0 kB
After compression 167.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

Original 102.1 kB
After minification 102.1 kB
After compression 100.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Impact.no has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Impact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

NO
Language Claimed

NB
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Impact.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Impact.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

impact.no

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Impact. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Impact

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)