5.2 sec in total
92 ms
3.6 sec
1.5 sec
Welcome to imr.eu homepage info - get ready to check Imr best content right away, or after learning these important things about imr.eu
The Turf Tank Two robotic line marker saves groundsmen time to focus on other important tasks, while the robot marks the pitches.
Visit imr.euWe analyzed Imr.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
imr.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value110 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.0 s
10/100
10%
92 ms
73 ms
66 ms
1814 ms
242 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Imr.eu, 59% (20 requests) were made to Turftank.com and 21% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Turftank.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (69%)
2.1 MB
646.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Imr.eu main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imr images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 312.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imr.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 312.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (30%)
20
14
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
imr.eu
92 ms
eu.turftank.com
73 ms
66 ms
1814 ms
LrUC4YIwz-w
242 ms
7TP1MzW1w30
687 ms
0NraVNprQPs
321 ms
lazysizes.min.js
196 ms
jquery.min.js
228 ms
js.cookie.min.js
225 ms
jquery.init.js
297 ms
us.core.min.js
225 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
127 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
936 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
971 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
972 ms
fa-light-300.woff
406 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
375 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
125 ms
www-player.css
301 ms
www-embed-player.js
387 ms
base.js
583 ms
fetch-polyfill.js
100 ms
logo-free.png
87 ms
en.png
435 ms
G-rating-100x39.png
371 ms
120-layouts-50x50.png
370 ms
1000-clients-worldwide-50x50.png
533 ms
100-employees-globally-50x50.png
372 ms
header-contact.jpg
534 ms
owl.carousel.js
191 ms
royalslider.js
165 ms
id
76 ms
ad_status.js
65 ms
imr.eu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
imr.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
imr.eu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imr.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imr.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imr.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Imr. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: