Tools & Wizards About Us
imroc.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

imroc.org

Imroc

Page Load Speed

739 ms in total

First Response

81 ms

Resources Loaded

452 ms

Page Rendered

206 ms

imroc.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to imroc.org homepage info - get ready to check Imroc best content right away, or after learning these important things about imroc.org

We transform systems to provide hope, opportunity, and control for the people within them. Our tools include training, consultancy and research.

Visit imroc.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Imroc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 81 ms and then it took 658 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imroc.org performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

42/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20,490 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.imroc.org

81 ms

legacy.js

20 ms

modern.js

27 ms

extract-css-runtime-f3ff0297e8b75bbf7b45-min.en-US.js

35 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

147 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Imroc.org, 46% (11 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com and 29% (7 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (267 ms) relates to the external source Dash.accessiblyapp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 351.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

5.3 MB

After Optimization

4.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Imroc.org main page is 5.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 200.4 kB

  • Original 229.5 kB
  • After minification 209.9 kB
  • After compression 29.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 115.3 kB

  • Original 3.7 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imroc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 32.5 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 1.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 30.3 kB
  • After minification 30.3 kB
  • After compression 26.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imroc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imroc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.imroc.org

www.imroc.org

81 ms

legacy.js

legacy.js

20 ms

modern.js

modern.js

27 ms

extract-css-runtime-f3ff0297e8b75bbf7b45-min.en-US.js

extract-css-runtime-f3ff0297e8b75bbf7b45-min.en-US.js

35 ms

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

extract-css-moment-js-vendor-6c569122bfa66a51a056-min.en-US.js

147 ms

cldr-resource-pack-f4df7777522f8adb8991-min.en-US.js

cldr-resource-pack-f4df7777522f8adb8991-min.en-US.js

34 ms

common-vendors-stable-61293f01d648eef165fc-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-stable-61293f01d648eef165fc-min.en-US.js

146 ms

common-vendors-978229e2d63e66267fad-min.en-US.js

common-vendors-978229e2d63e66267fad-min.en-US.js

147 ms

common-e1d6f1f940ecd59339ba-min.en-US.js

common-e1d6f1f940ecd59339ba-min.en-US.js

149 ms

commerce-1dad4b9bfcf40b75115b-min.en-US.js

commerce-1dad4b9bfcf40b75115b-min.en-US.js

147 ms

commerce-5af416c534ff65a9fbac-min.en-US.css

commerce-5af416c534ff65a9fbac-min.en-US.css

39 ms

performance-eeabbe783ca43a2b4344-min.en-US.js

performance-eeabbe783ca43a2b4344-min.en-US.js

146 ms

site.css

site.css

27 ms

static.css

static.css

29 ms

site-bundle.f131c0688902f6444457565c87292952.js

site-bundle.f131c0688902f6444457565c87292952.js

130 ms

autoload.js

autoload.js

267 ms

Imroc+logo+blue+on+white+with+tagline.jpg

Imroc+logo+blue+on+white+with+tagline.jpg

103 ms

blu.jpg

blu.jpg

59 ms

JD_08416.jpg

JD_08416.jpg

58 ms

JD_08238.jpg

JD_08238.jpg

60 ms

JD_08386.jpg

JD_08386.jpg

80 ms

JD_08453.jpg

JD_08453.jpg

59 ms

Imroc+logo+white+on+transparant+with+tagline.png

Imroc+logo+white+on+transparant+with+tagline.png

53 ms

accessibility-widget-v2.min.js

accessibility-widget-v2.min.js

36 ms

Accessibility Review

imroc.org accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

imroc.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

imroc.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imroc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imroc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

imroc.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Imroc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: