Tools & Wizards About Us
in-projekt.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

in-projekt.com

in-projekt - projektowanie wnętrz z nadzorem autorskim

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

331 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

166 ms

in-projekt.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to in-projekt.com homepage info - get ready to check In Projekt best content right away, or after learning these important things about in-projekt.com

Oferuję projektowanie wnętrz wraz z nadzorem autorskim na terenie Warszawy i okolic w konkurencyjnych cenach i dogodnych terminach.

Visit in-projekt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed In-projekt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 331 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

in-projekt.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

in-projekt.com

331 ms

in-projekt.com

1141 ms

autoptimize_e0cbdc319904883c86b83a8c3d2d5870.css

113 ms

327503afe28be7e34b16ee8caeda8320.min.css

454 ms

jquery.min.js

447 ms

Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original In-projekt.com, 34% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain In-projekt.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 755.3 kB (75%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

248.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of In-projekt.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 792.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 61.6 kB

  • Original 74.9 kB
  • After minification 72.5 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 70.9 kB
  • After minification 58.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, In Projekt needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 621.7 kB

  • Original 792.3 kB
  • After minification 629.7 kB
  • After compression 170.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 621.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 59.6 kB

  • Original 66.1 kB
  • After minification 44.6 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. In-projekt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.6 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (39%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Projekt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

in-projekt.com

in-projekt.com

331 ms

in-projekt.com

in-projekt.com

1141 ms

autoptimize_e0cbdc319904883c86b83a8c3d2d5870.css

autoptimize_e0cbdc319904883c86b83a8c3d2d5870.css

113 ms

327503afe28be7e34b16ee8caeda8320.min.css

327503afe28be7e34b16ee8caeda8320.min.css

454 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

447 ms

js

js

68 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

447 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

330 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

585 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

345 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

441 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

585 ms

autoptimize_23ff10aacd65d62fd146f94de4e8e40f.js

autoptimize_23ff10aacd65d62fd146f94de4e8e40f.js

885 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

454 ms

logo-new-80-1.jpg

logo-new-80-1.jpg

111 ms

logo-new-mobile-80.jpg

logo-new-mobile-80.jpg

114 ms

M-3-starowka24-e1685006731262.jpg

M-3-starowka24-e1685006731262.jpg

458 ms

projekt_m4_do_wynaj%C4%99cia_salon2.jpg

projekt_m4_do_wynaj%C4%99cia_salon2.jpg

332 ms

m4_mokotow_salon7.jpg

m4_mokotow_salon7.jpg

146 ms

lazienka5.jpg

lazienka5.jpg

221 ms

projekt_grochow_kuchnia-e1578168051539.jpg

projekt_grochow_kuchnia-e1578168051539.jpg

232 ms

m-2-%C5%9Br%C3%B3dmie%C5%9Bcie11.jpg

m-2-%C5%9Br%C3%B3dmie%C5%9Bcie11.jpg

367 ms

pokoj_dzieci_4.jpg

pokoj_dzieci_4.jpg

333 ms

ochota-m3-%C5%82azienka2-1.jpg

ochota-m3-%C5%82azienka2-1.jpg

457 ms

syp2popr.jpg

syp2popr.jpg

442 ms

aranzacja_sypialni3.jpg

aranzacja_sypialni3.jpg

444 ms

aranzacja_salonu1.jpg

aranzacja_salonu1.jpg

474 ms

dscn0871-e1578169246809.jpg

dscn0871-e1578169246809.jpg

479 ms

aranzacja_pokoju_tv3.jpg

aranzacja_pokoju_tv3.jpg

554 ms

samuraj.jpg

samuraj.jpg

556 ms

kuch-biala1.jpg

kuch-biala1.jpg

572 ms

to-lubie-3_1.jpg

to-lubie-3_1.jpg

572 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch.min.js

527 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.min.js

532 ms

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

wp-polyfill-url.min.js

608 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.min.js

618 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.min.js

629 ms

font

font

26 ms

font

font

28 ms

font

font

208 ms

font

font

36 ms

font

font

225 ms

font

font

28 ms

font

font

57 ms

font

font

131 ms

font

font

368 ms

font

font

271 ms

font

font

79 ms

font

font

163 ms

font

font

217 ms

font

font

185 ms

font

font

271 ms

font

font

230 ms

font

font

255 ms

font

font

244 ms

font

font

247 ms

font

font

459 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

113 ms

Accessibility Review

in-projekt.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Best Practices

in-projekt.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

in-projekt.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise In-projekt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that In-projekt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

in-projekt.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of In Projekt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: