Tools & Wizards About Us
in.security screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

in.security

In.security | Cyber Security Consultancy Specialists

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

689 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

in.security screenshot

About Website

Welcome to in.security homepage info - get ready to check In best content right away, or after learning these important things about in.security

Secure & protect your business' future with In.Security's cyber security consultancy & training. We're in security to prevent insecurity.

Visit in.security

Key Findings

We analyzed In.security page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

in.security performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,680 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.114

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

in.security

32 ms

in.security

71 ms

style.min.css

30 ms

styles.css

26 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original In.security, 8% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (469 ms) belongs to the original domain In.security.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of In.security main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 615.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 71.8 kB

  • Original 89.0 kB
  • After minification 89.0 kB
  • After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 615.4 kB
  • After minification 615.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. In images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 348.6 kB
  • After minification 348.6 kB
  • After compression 347.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 64 B

  • Original 88.4 kB
  • After minification 88.4 kB
  • After compression 88.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. In.security has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (53%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

in.security

in.security

32 ms

in.security

in.security

71 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

30 ms

styles.css

styles.css

26 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

34 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

35 ms

main.css

main.css

23 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

40 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

32 ms

cookie-law-info-table.css

cookie-law-info-table.css

32 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

13 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

31 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

32 ms

index.js

index.js

78 ms

index.js

index.js

37 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

77 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

77 ms

main.js

main.js

79 ms

block-editor.js

block-editor.js

81 ms

api.js

api.js

75 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

80 ms

index.js

index.js

83 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

170 ms

logo.png

logo.png

36 ms

dots-white.png

dots-white.png

154 ms

pentesting.jpg

pentesting.jpg

151 ms

dots-v-red.png

dots-v-red.png

34 ms

s1.png

s1.png

150 ms

s2.png

s2.png

152 ms

s4.png

s4.png

154 ms

s3.png

s3.png

155 ms

ryland-dean-6k6N8HTrXyE-unsplash-360x360.jpg

ryland-dean-6k6N8HTrXyE-unsplash-360x360.jpg

309 ms

fotis-fotopoulos-6sAl6aQ4OWI-unsplash-360x360.jpg

fotis-fotopoulos-6sAl6aQ4OWI-unsplash-360x360.jpg

308 ms

charles-deluvio-pjAH2Ax4uWk-unsplash-360x360.jpg

charles-deluvio-pjAH2Ax4uWk-unsplash-360x360.jpg

308 ms

shamin-haky-Uhx-gHPpCDg-unsplash-360x360.jpg

shamin-haky-Uhx-gHPpCDg-unsplash-360x360.jpg

308 ms

bh4.png

bh4.png

308 ms

happytears.jpg

happytears.jpg

468 ms

vpn-graphic-360x360.jpg

vpn-graphic-360x360.jpg

468 ms

shutterstock_552721804-360x360.jpg

shutterstock_552721804-360x360.jpg

468 ms

dots-red.png

dots-red.png

312 ms

logos.png

logos.png

468 ms

logo-black.png

logo-black.png

469 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

29 ms

anchor

anchor

41 ms

HI_diYsKILxRpg3hIP6sJ7fM7PqPMcMnZFqUwX28DBKXhM4.ttf

HI_diYsKILxRpg3hIP6sJ7fM7PqPMcMnZFqUwX28DBKXhM4.ttf

309 ms

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj4PVksj.ttf

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj4PVksj.ttf

330 ms

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj7oUUsj.ttf

V8mQoQDjQSkFtoMM3T6r8E7mF71Q-gOoraIAEj7oUUsj.ttf

330 ms

styles__ltr.css

styles__ltr.css

25 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

28 ms

js

js

110 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

107 ms

RI3Pk2QfVraTqUQvmENYAwISRapPH8Lx3ZoW8uCkQH4.js

RI3Pk2QfVraTqUQvmENYAwISRapPH8Lx3ZoW8uCkQH4.js

73 ms

webworker.js

webworker.js

70 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

56 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

183 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

196 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

197 ms

collect

collect

75 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

62 ms

Accessibility Review

in.security accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

in.security best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

in.security SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise In.security can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that In.security main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

in.security

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of In. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: