Tools & Wizards About Us
inapl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

inapl.com

Information Alignment | Mine Data Management

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

926 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

666 ms

inapl.com screenshot

About Website

Visit inapl.com now to see the best up-to-date Inapl content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inapl.com

Information Alignment are experts in Mining Data and Management Systems; bringing you more productive, more profitable and safer mines.

Visit inapl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inapl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 926 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inapl.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.6 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.064

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.6 s

18/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inapl.com

926 ms

autoptimize_f883dd279d0b12668146d369d0fd8438.css

1091 ms

autoptimize_fbfae96d16eee58e484bb1b428bd0b00.css

906 ms

autoptimize_single_7d0cd5a9b0b24901e10c6ea057a98dd5.css

928 ms

autoptimize_single_917eac9afa9815fa496bea300d04c4c8.css

672 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Inapl.com, 9% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Clarity.ms. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Inapl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.3 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Inapl.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 55.1 kB

  • Original 70.5 kB
  • After minification 69.0 kB
  • After compression 15.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inapl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 261 B

  • Original 700 B
  • After minification 700 B
  • After compression 439 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 261 B or 37% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (55%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inapl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inapl.com

inapl.com

926 ms

autoptimize_f883dd279d0b12668146d369d0fd8438.css

autoptimize_f883dd279d0b12668146d369d0fd8438.css

1091 ms

autoptimize_fbfae96d16eee58e484bb1b428bd0b00.css

autoptimize_fbfae96d16eee58e484bb1b428bd0b00.css

906 ms

autoptimize_single_7d0cd5a9b0b24901e10c6ea057a98dd5.css

autoptimize_single_7d0cd5a9b0b24901e10c6ea057a98dd5.css

928 ms

autoptimize_single_917eac9afa9815fa496bea300d04c4c8.css

autoptimize_single_917eac9afa9815fa496bea300d04c4c8.css

672 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

975 ms

js

js

70 ms

autoptimize_05dd9e538b71ff84348c4b0393fedb09.js

autoptimize_05dd9e538b71ff84348c4b0393fedb09.js

22 ms

css

css

32 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

199 ms

ik4penbwye

ik4penbwye

199 ms

INAPL_-1500x630.jpeg

INAPL_-1500x630.jpeg

1654 ms

INAPL.jpeg

INAPL.jpeg

1442 ms

1208Trimbleb-1030x687.jpg

1208Trimbleb-1030x687.jpg

1437 ms

Man-on-iPad-1030x736.jpg

Man-on-iPad-1030x736.jpg

1646 ms

font

font

41 ms

font

font

50 ms

entypo-fontello.woff

entypo-fontello.woff

1053 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

94 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

26 ms

insight.old.min.js

insight.old.min.js

3 ms

c.gif

c.gif

9 ms

Accessibility Review

inapl.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

inapl.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

inapl.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inapl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inapl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inapl.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inapl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: