Tools & Wizards About Us
inaturewatch.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

inaturewatch.org

iNaturewatch Foundation - Nature Walks, Online Courses, Environment

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

89 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

inaturewatch.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing INaturewatch content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inaturewatch.org

iNaturewatch Foundation is a Navi Mumbai based nonprofit working in the field of urban biodiversity and citizen science. We offer online courses & nature walks.

Visit inaturewatch.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Inaturewatch.org page load time and found that the first response time was 89 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inaturewatch.org performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inaturewatch.org

89 ms

rs=w:1920,m

268 ms

script.js

20 ms

UX.4.43.11.js

22 ms

script.js

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Inaturewatch.org, 89% (16 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 955.1 kB (23%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Inaturewatch.org main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 418.8 kB

  • Original 466.2 kB
  • After minification 466.2 kB
  • After compression 47.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 418.8 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 350 B

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. INaturewatch images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 535.9 kB

  • Original 722.2 kB
  • After minification 722.2 kB
  • After compression 186.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 535.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (24%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of INaturewatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inaturewatch.org

inaturewatch.org

89 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

268 ms

script.js

script.js

20 ms

UX.4.43.11.js

UX.4.43.11.js

22 ms

script.js

script.js

25 ms

js

js

56 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

326 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

432 ms

qt=q:95

qt=q:95

92 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

1643 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

508 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

221 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

585 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

571 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

588 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

1471 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

906 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

558 ms

Accessibility Review

inaturewatch.org accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

inaturewatch.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

inaturewatch.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inaturewatch.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inaturewatch.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inaturewatch.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of INaturewatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: