Tools & Wizards About Us
inbiomotion.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

inbiomotion.com

in.bio.motion

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

319 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

623 ms

inbiomotion.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing In Bio Motion content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about inbiomotion.com

This site was generated with Anima. www.animaapp.com

Visit inbiomotion.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inbiomotion.com page load time and found that the first response time was 319 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inbiomotion.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inbiomotion.com

319 ms

inbiomotion.com

390 ms

pro-oncologistmobile.css

94 ms

pro-pathologistmobile.css

185 ms

pro-pathologist.css

271 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Inbiomotion.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Inbiomotion.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (26%)

Content Size

8.7 MB

After Optimization

6.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inbiomotion.com main page is 8.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 8.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 55.2 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 50.2 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.5 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 8.5 MB
  • After minification 6.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, In Bio Motion needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 81.2 kB

  • Original 119.9 kB
  • After minification 115.5 kB
  • After compression 38.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 85.9 kB

  • Original 99.9 kB
  • After minification 82.0 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inbiomotion.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (41%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

48

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Bio Motion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inbiomotion.com

inbiomotion.com

319 ms

inbiomotion.com

inbiomotion.com

390 ms

pro-oncologistmobile.css

pro-oncologistmobile.css

94 ms

pro-pathologistmobile.css

pro-pathologistmobile.css

185 ms

pro-pathologist.css

pro-pathologist.css

271 ms

pro-oncologist.css

pro-oncologist.css

273 ms

home-all-breakpoints.css

home-all-breakpoints.css

454 ms

styleguide.css

styleguide.css

273 ms

globals.css

globals.css

367 ms

inbio-n--9-standard-scalex@1x.png

inbio-n--9-standard-scalex@1x.png

822 ms

subtraction-3@1x.png

subtraction-3@1x.png

450 ms

subtraction-4@1x.png

subtraction-4@1x.png

541 ms

path-49@1x.png

path-49@1x.png

365 ms

path-168-1@1x.png

path-168-1@1x.png

487 ms

inbio-home-mid@1x.png

inbio-home-mid@1x.png

904 ms

graphic-pin-point-gray@1x.png

graphic-pin-point-gray@1x.png

541 ms

path-201@1x.png

path-201@1x.png

544 ms

line-1@1x.png

line-1@1x.png

547 ms

path-200-1@1x.png

path-200-1@1x.png

632 ms

path-8-9@1x.png

path-8-9@1x.png

634 ms

path-67-12@1x.png

path-67-12@1x.png

635 ms

path-68-11@1x.png

path-68-11@1x.png

638 ms

path-69-11@1x.png

path-69-11@1x.png

723 ms

path-70-11@1x.png

path-70-11@1x.png

724 ms

path-71-12@1x.png

path-71-12@1x.png

726 ms

path-72-11@1x.png

path-72-11@1x.png

728 ms

path-166-1@1x.png

path-166-1@1x.png

814 ms

path-167@1x.png

path-167@1x.png

820 ms

polygon-2@1x.png

polygon-2@1x.png

823 ms

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

jquery-3.7.1.min.js

996 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

902 ms

app.js

app.js

906 ms

mask-group-4@1x.png

mask-group-4@1x.png

913 ms

exclusion-1-1x-png@1x.png

exclusion-1-1x-png@1x.png

912 ms

path-64-1@1x.png

path-64-1@1x.png

992 ms

path-171-1x-png@1x.png

path-171-1x-png@1x.png

993 ms

path-107-1@1x.png

path-107-1@1x.png

1006 ms

inbio-n--8--2@1x.png

inbio-n--8--2@1x.png

1184 ms

path-8-101@1x.png

path-8-101@1x.png

922 ms

path-76@1x.png

path-76@1x.png

907 ms

new-mj-images--9--1@1x.png

new-mj-images--9--1@1x.png

1090 ms

path-64-14@1x.png

path-64-14@1x.png

825 ms

new-mj-images--6--1@1x.png

new-mj-images--6--1@1x.png

1182 ms

path-64-15@1x.png

path-64-15@1x.png

739 ms

reset.min.css

reset.min.css

27 ms

css

css

35 ms

5f3ba5585037dfb33783a3ff.5f3ba57ab8808e0feafbf76d.EEHQuad.hcp.png

5f3ba5585037dfb33783a3ff.5f3ba57ab8808e0feafbf76d.EEHQuad.hcp.png

25 ms

path-75-1@1x.png

path-75-1@1x.png

814 ms

line-4-1@1x.png

line-4-1@1x.png

738 ms

path-8-104@1x.png

path-8-104@1x.png

709 ms

line-11-1@1x.png

line-11-1@1x.png

784 ms

line-10-1@1x.png

line-10-1@1x.png

739 ms

path-177-1@1x.png

path-177-1@1x.png

741 ms

path-8-111@1x.png

path-8-111@1x.png

742 ms

logo-icrea-1x-png@1x.png

logo-icrea-1x-png@1x.png

817 ms

inbio-n--9-standard-scalex-1@1x.png

inbio-n--9-standard-scalex-1@1x.png

1096 ms

subtraction-4-1-1x-png@1x.png

subtraction-4-1-1x-png@1x.png

740 ms

subtraction-3-1-1x-png@1x.png

subtraction-3-1-1x-png@1x.png

742 ms

inbio-home-mid-1@1x.png

inbio-home-mid-1@1x.png

903 ms

path-49-2@1x.png

path-49-2@1x.png

732 ms

path-8-36@1x.png

path-8-36@1x.png

740 ms

path-67-5@1x.png

path-67-5@1x.png

742 ms

path-68-5@1x.png

path-68-5@1x.png

816 ms

path-69-5@1x.png

path-69-5@1x.png

730 ms

path-70-5@1x.png

path-70-5@1x.png

735 ms

path-71-5-1x-png@1x.png

path-71-5-1x-png@1x.png

737 ms

path-72-5@1x.png

path-72-5@1x.png

810 ms

path-166-2@1x.png

path-166-2@1x.png

731 ms

path-167-2-1x-png@1x.png

path-167-2-1x-png@1x.png

730 ms

mask-group-4-1@1x.png

mask-group-4-1@1x.png

739 ms

exclusion-1-1-1x-png@1x.png

exclusion-1-1-1x-png@1x.png

734 ms

path-75-2-1x-png@1x.png

path-75-2-1x-png@1x.png

807 ms

path-208@1x.png

path-208@1x.png

730 ms

path-205@1x.png

path-205@1x.png

730 ms

path-177-10@1x.png

path-177-10@1x.png

730 ms

path-209@1x.png

path-209@1x.png

731 ms

logo-icrea-2-1x-png-1x-png@1x.png

logo-icrea-2-1x-png-1x-png@1x.png

798 ms

path-64@1x.png

path-64@1x.png

730 ms

path-199@1x.png

path-199@1x.png

728 ms

path-170-1x-png@1x.png

path-170-1x-png@1x.png

717 ms

path-64-13@1x.png

path-64-13@1x.png

652 ms

path-106-1@1x.png

path-106-1@1x.png

648 ms

path-105-1@1x.png

path-105-1@1x.png

718 ms

barcelona-logo-1@1x.png

barcelona-logo-1@1x.png

714 ms

group-119-1x-png@1x.png

group-119-1x-png@1x.png

642 ms

Accessibility Review

inbiomotion.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

inbiomotion.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

inbiomotion.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inbiomotion.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Inbiomotion.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inbiomotion.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of In Bio Motion. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: