5.9 sec in total
1.6 sec
4.1 sec
188 ms
Visit inburton.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Inburton content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inburton.co.uk
InBurton.co.uk - Burton on Trent Oline
Visit inburton.co.ukWe analyzed Inburton.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
inburton.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.4 s
0/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value18.8 s
0/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.127
82/100
15%
Value15.1 s
7/100
10%
1614 ms
197 ms
187 ms
184 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Inburton.co.uk, 6% (5 requests) were made to App.getresponse.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Inburton.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 548.3 kB (66%)
827.0 kB
278.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Inburton.co.uk main page is 827.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 350.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inburton images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 265.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 265.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 215.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inburton.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 215.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (72%)
79
22
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inburton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.inburton.co.uk
1614 ms
style.css
197 ms
custom.css
187 ms
basic.css
184 ms
css
27 ms
frm_display.css
186 ms
events_manager.css
181 ms
main-min.css
185 ms
style.css
267 ms
style_2.1.2.css
268 ms
jquery-latest.pack.js
20 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
361 ms
rotating_tweet.js
289 ms
load_ads.js
292 ms
information-reel.js
290 ms
scroll-post-excerpt.js
366 ms
vertical-scroll-recent-post.js
366 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
54 ms
events-manager.js
536 ms
scroll-rss-excerpt.js
398 ms
jquery.cycle.all.2.73.js
16 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
398 ms
wp_sc_magic-custom.js
449 ms
style.css
455 ms
notify-min.js
454 ms
prettyPhoto.css
466 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
583 ms
modernizr.js
550 ms
jquery.cookie.js
550 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
550 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
559 ms
superfish.js
625 ms
menu.js
635 ms
recurring_event.js
644 ms
modernizr-custom.js
651 ms
view_webform.js
100 ms
script_no_follow_2.1.2.js
673 ms
widgets.js
126 ms
button.facebook.js
687 ms
all.js
476 ms
button.googleplus.js
719 ms
wp-embed.min.js
740 ms
jquery.cycle.all.2.73.js
42 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
644 ms
widgets.js
40 ms
InBurton-Burton-on-Trent-Logo2.png
325 ms
smartfits-small-150x105.jpg
287 ms
rating_off.png
289 ms
HighwoodDayNursery-150x105.jpg
289 ms
DJMearsRoofingLogoLarge-150x105.jpg
290 ms
drivingschoolburtonontrent-150x105.jpg
326 ms
rating_on.png
540 ms
DavidFinch-150x105.jpg
540 ms
martin-brickie-150x105.jpg
538 ms
i_twitter.png
538 ms
i_facebook.png
538 ms
input-cont-left.png
406 ms
input-cont-mid.png
517 ms
input-cont-right.png
516 ms
search-blank.png
515 ms
nav-bg.png
504 ms
cat_nav_n.png
502 ms
featured.png
502 ms
i_comment2.png
572 ms
bullet_b.png
576 ms
countertemplates.png
27 ms
lock.png
25 ms
arrow.png
101 ms
ga.js
74 ms
plusone.js
74 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
46 ms
246 ms
__utm.gif
222 ms
xd_arbiter.php
342 ms
xd_arbiter.php
546 ms
ping
217 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
99 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
86 ms
info.json
93 ms
print.css
97 ms
jot
91 ms
webform-out.js
19 ms
inburton.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
inburton.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
inburton.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inburton.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Inburton.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inburton.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inburton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: