1 sec in total
107 ms
832 ms
94 ms
Click here to check amazing Incedia content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about incedia.com
A web design company that delivers engaging, bespoke websites with cutting-edge design, intelligent brand identity and effective outcomes.
Visit incedia.comWe analyzed Incedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 107 ms and then it took 926 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
incedia.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value5.1 s
76/100
10%
107 ms
148 ms
45 ms
81 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Incedia.com, 13% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (293 ms) relates to the external source Moderate.cleantalk.org.
Page size can be reduced by 27.9 kB (4%)
774.2 kB
746.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Incedia.com main page is 774.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 706.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 218 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Incedia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 174 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174 B or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 583 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Incedia.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (48%)
25
13
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Incedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
incedia.com
107 ms
incedia.com
148 ms
style.min.css
45 ms
cleantalk-public.min.css
81 ms
styles.css
96 ms
css
14 ms
style.css
132 ms
jquery.js
141 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
139 ms
ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js
293 ms
min.header.js
101 ms
index.js
111 ms
index.js
126 ms
min.js
153 ms
comment-reply.min.js
153 ms
gtagv4.js
198 ms
logo-incedia.png
82 ms
start-your-project-background.jpg
80 ms
default-white.jpg
78 ms
default-black.jpg
103 ms
Douglas-Thumbnail-1420x1420.jpg
115 ms
Shea-thumbnail-1420x1420.jpg
80 ms
Katie-Thumbnail-1420x1420.jpg
115 ms
Wurkspace-Thumbnail-1420x1420.jpg
119 ms
Motiva-Thumbnail-1420x1420.jpg
161 ms
Carecci-thumbnail-1420x1420.jpg
214 ms
logos-and-marks-thumbnail-1420x1420.jpg
118 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf
20 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffGjEGItzZg.ttf
21 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZg.ttf
22 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf
20 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
118 ms
incedia.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
incedia.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
incedia.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Incedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Incedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
incedia.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Incedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: