4.4 sec in total
346 ms
2.4 sec
1.7 sec
Welcome to incharge.rocks homepage info - get ready to check Incharge best content for Switzerland right away, or after learning these important things about incharge.rocks
At Rolling Square, we focus on creating innovative tech products that solve everyday problems in uncommon ways, by seamlessly hacking our lives.
Visit incharge.rocksWe analyzed Incharge.rocks page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
incharge.rocks performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value13.2 s
0/100
25%
Value12.8 s
2/100
10%
Value2,940 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.0 s
1/100
10%
346 ms
200 ms
284 ms
282 ms
283 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Incharge.rocks, 9% (7 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Incharge.rocks.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (24%)
4.9 MB
3.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Incharge.rocks main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 231.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Incharge images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 678.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 678.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 241.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Incharge.rocks needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 241.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (52%)
64
31
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Incharge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
incharge.rocks
346 ms
jquery.min.js
200 ms
jquery.poptrox.min.js
284 ms
jquery.scrolly.min.js
282 ms
jquery.scrollgress.min.js
283 ms
skel.min.js
286 ms
init.js
284 ms
main.js
297 ms
ajax.js
374 ms
celery.js
103 ms
style.css
98 ms
style-wide.css
97 ms
style-normal.css
96 ms
css
26 ms
font-awesome.min.css
98 ms
because.png
138 ms
tru.png
133 ms
giz.png
134 ms
wir.png
135 ms
gea.png
135 ms
01.jpg
438 ms
02.jpg
495 ms
03.jpg
568 ms
04.jpg
566 ms
05.jpg
493 ms
06.jpg
517 ms
reviews.jpg
956 ms
staron.png
592 ms
staroff.png
594 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
overlaylight.png
583 ms
introa.jpg
922 ms
overlay.png
628 ms
one.jpg
1216 ms
dark-arrow.svg
662 ms
two.jpg
1214 ms
three.jpg
1214 ms
overlay2.png
755 ms
customers.jpg
1212 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff
56 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGHiec-hVyr2k4iOzEQsW1iE.woff
57 ms
bottombar.jpg
991 ms
MQQnaKP4x2E
109 ms
o.min.js
197 ms
collect
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
955 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
67 ms
www-embed-player.js
91 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
34 ms
ad_status.js
101 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
88 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
97 ms
5592ad0810c2bc03007aef94
221 ms
dfe5pip.js
142 ms
main.css
112 ms
modernizr.min.js
51 ms
xdomain.min.js
50 ms
main.min.js
178 ms
d
57 ms
analytics.min.js
434 ms
p.gif
307 ms
cebClZvbvf8Ceyw01AAAAA==
7 ms
AnssNNQAAAA=
7 ms
PtlFza0Mzu1EzuExzzaEhBLIvf5VybyE2cuXLm53fsverQ0zgAAAA==
6 ms
G3ea6ilOSEg3mQSDhcQL
255 ms
analytics.js
86 ms
mixpanel-2-latest.min.js
29 ms
89 ms
83 ms
83 ms
collect
40 ms
collect
46 ms
collect
53 ms
collect
60 ms
incharge.rocks accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
incharge.rocks best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
incharge.rocks SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Incharge.rocks can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Incharge.rocks main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
incharge.rocks
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Incharge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: